IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jothpo/v36y2024i3p256-274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Formal models in normative political theory

Author

Listed:
  • Hun Chung

    (Department of Quantitative Theory and Methods, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
    Faculty of Political Science and Economics, 13148Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan)

  • Brian Kogelmann

    (Department of Philosophy and Department of Political Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA)

Abstract

This article revisits the conventional distinction in political science between ‘positive’ and ‘normative’ political theory, particularly the belief that formal and mathematical methods are only pertinent to positive political theory. We argue that formal models are equally valuable in normative political theory for three reasons: they can make thought experiments more rigorous, they can demonstrate the consistency of normative principles, and they can provide insights into the practical workings of novel institutional arrangements in the absence of empirical data. The integration of formal models into normative political theory presents challenges, including the development of criteria for evaluating these models and potential shifts in research focus. Integration can also strengthen political theory’s tenuous role in the political science discipline.

Suggested Citation

  • Hun Chung & Brian Kogelmann, 2024. "Formal models in normative political theory," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 36(3), pages 256-274, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:36:y:2024:i:3:p:256-274
    DOI: 10.1177/09516298241266267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09516298241266267
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09516298241266267?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:36:y:2024:i:3:p:256-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.