IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v62y2018i1p143-173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Is Collective Exposure to War Events Related to More Acceptance of Collective Guilt?

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra Penic
  • Guy Elcheroth
  • Dario Spini

Abstract

Previous studies adopting the collective vulnerability approach have shown that condemnation of war atrocities is grounded in communal experiences of victimization and is strongest in locations where victimization was spread across ethnic boundaries. Based on a representative survey conducted in 2006 ( N = 2,012) across the former Yugoslavia, we find a similar pattern for acceptance of collective guilt. While personal victimization does not have a significant impact, the acceptance of guilt is strongest in more war-affected regions. Moreover, the results show the importance of the type of communal-level victimization: acceptance of guilt is lowest in regions marked by asymmetric violence and highest in regions marked by symmetric violence. Our findings suggest that collective victimization should not be treated as a uniform phenomenon and challenge the assumption that rejection of in-group guilt is an inevitable outcome of collective victimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra Penic & Guy Elcheroth & Dario Spini, 2018. "When Is Collective Exposure to War Events Related to More Acceptance of Collective Guilt?," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 62(1), pages 143-173, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:62:y:2018:i:1:p:143-173
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002716645388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002716645388
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002716645388?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laia Balcells & Patricia Justino, 2014. "Bridging Micro and Macro Approaches on Civil Wars and Political Violence," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 58(8), pages 1343-1359, December.
    2. Gerald Schneider & Margit Bussmann & Constantin Ruhe, 2012. "The Dynamics of Mass Killings: Testing Time-Series Models of One-Sided Violence in the Bosnian Civil War," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 443-461, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johannes Blum & Klaus Gründler, 2020. "Political Stability and Economic Prosperity: Are Coups Bad for Growth?," CESifo Working Paper Series 8317, CESifo.
    2. Anke Hoeffler & Patricia Justino, 2024. "Aid and fragile states," Chapters, in: Raj M. Desai & Shantayanan Devarajan & Jennifer L. Tobin (ed.), Handbook of Aid and Development, chapter 14, pages 225-246, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Joan Esteban & Massimo Morelli & Dominic Rohner, 2015. "Strategic Mass Killings," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 123(5), pages 1087-1132.
    4. Michael Wahman & Edward Goldring, 2020. "Pre-election violence and territorial control: Political dominance and subnational election violence in polarized African electoral systems," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(1), pages 93-110, January.
    5. Travers Barclay Child & Elena Nikolova, 2017. "War and Social Attitudes: Revisiting Consensus Views," HiCN Working Papers 258, Households in Conflict Network.
    6. Spencer Dorsey, 2020. "The opportunity cost of intrastate violence and the out-of-sample validity of commodity price shocks," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 17(3), pages 309-324, July.
    7. Martin Ottmann, 2017. "Rebel constituencies and rebel violence against civilians in civil conflicts," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 34(1), pages 27-51, January.
    8. Tilman Brück & Patricia Justino & Charles Patrick MartinShields, 2017. "Conflict and development: Recent research advances and future agendas," WIDER Working Paper Series 178, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    9. Tilman Brück & Patricia Justino & Charles Patrick Martin-Shields, 2017. "Conflict and development: Recent research advances and future agendas," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-178, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Sosso FEINDOUNO & Michaël GOUJON & Laurent WAGNER, 2016. "Indice de la Violence Interne : une mesure composite et quantitative de la violence et de la criminalité internes dans les pays en développement," Working Papers P151, FERDI.
    11. Valentina Baú, 2016. "Citizen engagement in peacebuilding: A communication for development approach to rebuilding peace from the bottom-up," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 16(4), pages 348-360, October.
    12. Patricia Justino & Wolfgang Stojetz, 2019. "Civic legacies of wartime governance," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-104, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    13. Sosso FEINDOUNO & Michaël GOUJON & Laurent WAGNER, 2016. "Internal Violence Index: a composite and quantitative measure of internal violence and crime in developing countries," Working Papers P151, FERDI.
    14. Karin Dyrstad & Solveig Hillesund, 2020. "Explaining Support for Political Violence: Grievance and Perceived Opportunity," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(9), pages 1724-1753, October.
    15. PatriÌ cia Justino & Wolfgang Stojetz, 2018. "On the Legacies of Wartime Governance," HiCN Working Papers 263, Households in Conflict Network.
    16. Anderton Charles H. & Carter John R., 2015. "A New Look at Weak State Conditions and Genocide Risk," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 21(1), pages 1-36, January.
    17. Christopher Gelpi, 2017. "Democracies in Conflict," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(9), pages 1925-1949, October.
    18. Laia Balcells & Lesley-Ann Daniels & Abel Escrib�-Folch, 2014. "The determinants of low-intensity intergroup violence. The case of Northern Ireland," HiCN Working Papers 190, Households in Conflict Network.
    19. Daniel Druckman & Lynn Wagner, 2019. "Justice Matters: Peace Negotiations, Stable Agreements, and Durable Peace," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(2), pages 287-316, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:62:y:2018:i:1:p:143-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.