IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v57y2013i6p1109-1127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Waning of War is Real: A Response to Gohdes and Price

Author

Listed:
  • Bethany Lacina
  • Nils Petter Gleditsch

Abstract

A number of recent studies argue that there is decline in armed conflict within and between nations. Gohdes and Price run against the grain in arguing that there is no evidence for a decrease in battle deaths in armed conflicts after World War II and that the trend reported in our earlier articles is spurious. However, they do not plausibly justify this thesis. We reexamine the argument for a decline, exploring nonlinearities in the data and potential biases due to measurement error. We find that very strong assumptions must hold in order for measurement errors to explain the trend in battle deaths.

Suggested Citation

  • Bethany Lacina & Nils Petter Gleditsch, 2013. "The Waning of War is Real: A Response to Gohdes and Price," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 57(6), pages 1109-1127, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:57:y:2013:i:6:p:1109-1127
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002712459709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002712459709
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002712459709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Spagat & Andrew Mack & Tara Cooper & Joakim Kreutz, 2009. "Estimating War Deaths," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 53(6), pages 934-950, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anita Gohdes & Megan Price, 2013. "First Things First: Assessing Data Quality before Model Quality," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 57(6), pages 1090-1108, December.
    2. Jeffrey R. Bloem, 2019. "Good Intentions Gone Bad? The Dodd-Frank Act and Conflict in Africa’s Great Lakes Region," HiCN Working Papers 300, Households in Conflict Network.
    3. Cirillo, Pasquale & Taleb, Nassim Nicholas, 2016. "On the statistical properties and tail risk of violent conflicts," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 452(C), pages 29-45.
    4. Jeffrey R. Bloem, 2023. "Good Intentions Gone Bad? The Dodd-Frank Act and Conflict in Africa’s Great Lakes Region," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 71(2), pages 621-666.
    5. Sophia Dawkins, 2021. "The problem of the missing dead," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(5), pages 1098-1116, September.
    6. de Waal, Alex & Hazlett, Chad & Davenport, Christian & Kennedy, Joshua, 2014. "The epidemiology of lethal violence in Darfur: Using micro-data to explore complex patterns of ongoing armed conflict," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 368-377.
    7. Tilman Brück & Patricia Justino & Philip Verwimp & Alexandra Avdeenko, 2010. "Identifying Conflict and Violence in Micro-Level Surveys," Economics of Security Working Paper Series 38, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    8. Tilman Br�ck & Patricia Justino & Philip Verwimp & Andrew Tedesco & Alexandra Avdeenko, 2013. "Measuring Conflict Exposure in Micro-Level Surveys," HiCN Working Papers 153, Households in Conflict Network.
    9. Tilman Brück & Patricia Justino & Philip Verwimp & Alexandra Avdeenko & Andrew Tedesco, 2016. "Measuring Violent Conflict in Micro-level Surveys: Current Practices and Methodological Challenges," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 31(1), pages 29-58.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:57:y:2013:i:6:p:1109-1127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.