IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v44y2000i3p333-358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fair Division, Adjusted Winner Procedure (AW), and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

Author

Listed:
  • Tansa George Massoud

    (Department of Political Science, Bucknell University)

Abstract

A dispute resolution mechanism called Adjusted Winner (AW), developed by Brams and Taylor, is used to propose a plausible solution to the final status issues between Israel and the Palestinians. Unlike conventional negotiating procedures, AW possesses desirable qualities including equitability, efficiency, and envy freeness. Based on data from an original survey, results show that when the issues of security and borders are kept separate, Israel is likely to have its demands met on the issues of security, East Jerusalem, normalization of relations, and water. The Palestinians will win on the issues of sovereignty, Israeli settlements in the West Bank, Israeli settlements in Gaza, and Palestinian refugees. Both sides will need to compromise on the issue of boundaries. If security and borders are lumped together as one issue, Israel and the Palestinians will share on the issue of East Jerusalem.

Suggested Citation

  • Tansa George Massoud, 2000. "Fair Division, Adjusted Winner Procedure (AW), and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 44(3), pages 333-358, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:44:y:2000:i:3:p:333-358
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002700044003003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002700044003003
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002700044003003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ershad Oftadeh & Mojtaba Shourian & Bahram Saghafian, 2017. "An Ultimatum Game Theory Based Approach for Basin Scale Water Allocation Conflict Resolution," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(13), pages 4293-4308, October.
    2. Kyropoulou, Maria & Ortega, Josué & Segal-Halevi, Erel, 2022. "Fair cake-cutting in practice," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 28-49.
    3. Keith W. Hipel & D. Marc Kilgour & Rami A. Kinsara, 2014. "Strategic Investigations of Water Conflicts in the Middle East," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 355-376, May.
    4. John Zeleznikow, 2014. "Comparing the Israel–Palestinian Dispute to Australian Family Mediation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 1301-1317, November.
    5. Maria Kyropoulou & Josu'e Ortega & Erel Segal-Halevi, 2018. "Fair Cake-Cutting in Practice," Papers 1810.08243, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    6. Robby Timothy Warioba & Kennedy Arthur Wainyaragania & Bassiratu Ballay Mansaray, 2019. "A Game Theory View of China and USA FDI Outflows: Static Cournot Model of Complete Information," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 5(2), pages 99-107, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:44:y:2000:i:3:p:333-358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.