IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v38y1994i1p24-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Democracies, Disputes, and Third-Party Intermediaries

Author

Listed:
  • Gregory A. Raymond

    (Boise State University)

Abstract

The proposition that democracies rarely fight one another has been well-substantiated by empirical research. A prominent explanation for this finding is that shared norms fostered by a democratic political culture promote peaceful conflict resolution. Joint democratic dyads allegedly have a greater propensity than other types of dyads to entrust third parties with judicial competence to settle their disputes. The results from a study of 206 dyadic disputes involving third-party intermediaries support this claim. The presence of joint democracy in dangerous, war-prone dyads has a strong positive effect on the probability of referring interstate disputes to binding third-party settlement, even when controlling for alliance bonds and geographic proximity. In addition, the more a joint democratic dyad is marked by coherent regimes or a rough parity in the distribution of military capabilities, the greater the propensity to refer disputes to binding third-party settlement.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregory A. Raymond, 1994. "Democracies, Disputes, and Third-Party Intermediaries," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 38(1), pages 24-42, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:38:y:1994:i:1:p:24-42
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002794038001002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002794038001002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002794038001002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moore, David W., 1974. "Foreign Policy and Empirical Democratic Theory," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(3), pages 1192-1197, September.
    2. Aurélie Charles, 2012. "Introduction," Perspectives from Social Economics, in: Exchange Entitlement Mapping, pages 1-7, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Coplin, William D. & Rochester, J. Martin, 1972. "The Permanent Court of International Justice, the International Court of Justice, the League of Nations, and the United Nations: A Comparative Empirical Survey," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 66(2), pages 529-550, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Petersen Karen K., 2008. "There is More to the Story than 'Us-Versus-Them': Expanding the Study of Interstate Conflict and Regime Type Beyond a Dichotomy," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 14(1), pages 62-96, April.
    2. Rana Arslan Tariq, 2015. "Trade and Conflicts: Do Preferential Trade Agreements Matter?," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 21(4), pages 561-574, December.
    3. Florian Justwan & Sarah K. Fisher, 2017. "Generalized Social Trust and International Dispute Settlement," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 717-743, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacob K. Goeree & Charles A. Holt, 2001. "Ten Little Treasures of Game Theory and Ten Intuitive Contradictions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(5), pages 1402-1422, December.
    2. Winkler, Adalbert, 2001. "On the need for an international lender of last resort: Lessons from domestic financial markets," W.E.P. - Würzburg Economic Papers 28, University of Würzburg, Department of Economics.
    3. Judy L Klein, 2015. "The Cold War Hot House for Modeling Strategies at the Carnegie Institute of Technology," Working Papers Series 19, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
    4. Lawrence J. Christiano & Roberto Motto & Massimo Rostagno, 2003. "The Great Depression and the Friedman-Schwartz hypothesis," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, pages 1119-1215.
    5. Gulino, Salvatore, 2012. "Obsolescence Of The 30-Year Mortgage," MPRA Paper 55354, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. James Lee Ray, 1998. "R. J. Rummel's Understanding Conflict and War: An Overlooked Classic?," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 16(2), pages 125-147, September.
    7. David L. Rousseau, 2002. "Motivations for Choice," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 46(3), pages 394-426, June.
    8. Mikhail Chernov & Brett R. Dunn & Francis A. Longstaff, 2018. "Macroeconomic-Driven Prepayment Risk and the Valuation of Mortgage-Backed Securities," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 31(3), pages 1132-1183.
    9. Harvey Starr, 2000. "Substitutability in Foreign Policy," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 44(1), pages 128-138, February.
    10. William Reed & David H. Clark, 2000. "War Initiators and War Winners," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 44(3), pages 378-395, June.
    11. Robert D. Behn, 1992. "Baseball management and public management: The testable vs. the important," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(2), pages 315-321.
    12. Bart Hawkins Kreps, 2020. "Energy Sprawl in the Renewable‐Energy Sector: Moving to Sufficiency in a Post Growth Era," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(3), pages 719-749, May.
    13. G. D. Hess, 1995. "An Introduction To Lewis Fry Richardson and His Mathematical Theory of War and Peace," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 14(1), pages 77-113, February.
    14. Juan-Manuel Renero, 2000. "May the Worst Commodity Standard be the Best? A Re-enactment of "The Crimes of 1873"," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1522, Econometric Society.
    15. John Brehm & Emerson M. S. Niou, 1997. "Police Patrol versus Self-Policing," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 9(1), pages 107-130, January.
    16. Waggoner, Daniel F. & Zha, Tao, 2003. "Likelihood preserving normalization in multiple equation models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 329-347, June.
    17. Steven V. Miller & Douglas M. Gibler, 2011. "Democracies, Territory, and Negotiated Compromises," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 28(3), pages 261-279, July.
    18. Bart Hawkins Kreps, 2020. "The Rising Costs of Fossil‐Fuel Extraction: An Energy Crisis That Will Not Go Away," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(3), pages 695-717, May.
    19. Dharm P. S. Bhawuk, 2010. "Methodology for Building Psychological Models from Scriptures," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 22(1), pages 49-93, March.
    20. W. Merriman & Edward Carmines, 1987. "Salmon's critique of Hempel: an alternative view of statistical explanation and theory building," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 275-289, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:38:y:1994:i:1:p:24-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.