IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v36y1992i4p709-732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ontologies, Problem Representation, and the Cuban Missile Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Donald A. Sylvan

    (Ohio State University)

  • Stuart J. Thorson

    (Syracuse University)

Abstract

“Problem representation†and “ontology†are introduced as concepts critical to understanding foreign policy decision making. The article explicates these concepts and their relationship and focuses on such issues of representation rather than veridical descriptions of reality, thereby shifting attention away from concern with misperception and toward attempting to understand how these representations are socially constructed and modified. It is argued that the conflict resolution process can be enhanced by inclusion of concerns with “problem representation†and “ontology†along with traditional interest in “option selection.†These concepts are then related to decision making in the cuban missile crisis. Two different ways of using new information on the crisis — and more generally understanding foreign policy decision making — are presented. The first is deemed an “option selection†perspective. A second approach expresses a theory of foreign policy decision making in a model of one important aspect of the Cuban missile crisis — the debate over whether Soviet missiles in Cuba were offensive. That model illustrates why focusing primarily on options or alternatives may obscure the most critical determinants of decision making. By focusing on ontologies and problem representations, the new model illustrates an approach to understanding and representing why some decision makers are predisposed to particular options over others.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald A. Sylvan & Stuart J. Thorson, 1992. "Ontologies, Problem Representation, and the Cuban Missile Crisis," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(4), pages 709-732, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:36:y:1992:i:4:p:709-732
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002792036004005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002792036004005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002792036004005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Masahide Horita, 2000. "Folding Arguments: A Method for Representing Conflicting Views of a Conflict," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 63-83, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:36:y:1992:i:4:p:709-732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.