IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v23y1979i4p613-628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple Aim Point Basing

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey T. Richelson

    (Analytical Assessments Corporation Marina del Rey, California)

Abstract

A major concern of some strategic analysts and Defense Department officials is the projected vulnerability of the U.S. land-based missile force. One proposed solution to this problem is the deployment of the MX in a mobile basing mode. A basing mode that received strong support from Department of Defense officials was the Multiple Aim Point (MAP) system In this article we examine vulnerability and verification problems associated with a MAP system as the ability to detect the location of a missile in a group of silos varies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey T. Richelson, 1979. "Multiple Aim Point Basing," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 23(4), pages 613-628, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:23:y:1979:i:4:p:613-628
    DOI: 10.1177/002200277902300402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002200277902300402
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002200277902300402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven J. Brams, 1975. "Newcomb's Problem and Prisoners' Dilemma," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 19(4), pages 596-612, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stan A. Kaplowitz, 1977. "The Influence of Moral Considerations on the Perceived Consequences of an Action," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 21(3), pages 475-500, September.
    2. Max Albert & Ronald A. Heiner, 2003. "An Indirect-Evolution Approad to Newcomb's Problem," Homo Oeconomicus, Institute of SocioEconomics, vol. 20, pages 161-194.
    3. L^e Nguy^en Hoang, 2020. "Purely Bayesian counterfactuals versus Newcomb's paradox," Papers 2008.04256, arXiv.org.
    4. Robert Axelrod, 1980. "Effective Choice in the Prisoner's Dilemma," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 24(1), pages 3-25, March.
    5. Babajanyan, S.G. & Melkikh, A.V. & Allahverdyan, A.E., 2020. "Leadership scenarios in prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    6. Steven J. Brams, 1977. "Deception in 2 × 2 Games," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 2(2), pages 171-203, February.
    7. Robert Lapson, 1993. "Cooperation by Indirect Revelation Through Strategic Behavior," Discussion Papers 1036, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    8. Thomas A. Weber, 2016. "A robust resolution of Newcomb’s paradox," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 81(3), pages 339-356, September.
    9. S. Plous, 1985. "Perceptual Illusions and Military Realities," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 29(3), pages 363-389, September.
    10. Jeffrey Goldberg & Lívia Markoczy & G. Lawrence Zahn, 2005. "Symmetry and the Illusion of Control as Bases for Cooperative Behavior," Rationality and Society, , vol. 17(2), pages 243-270, May.
    11. Brams, Steven & Kilgour, Marc, 2017. "Stabilizing unstable outcomes in prediction games," MPRA Paper 77655, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:23:y:1979:i:4:p:613-628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.