IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v21y1977i4p663-684.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Game-Theoretic Analysis Of the Vietnam Negotiations

Author

Listed:
  • Frank C. Zagare

    (Departments of Politics and Economics New York University)

Abstract

This article employs game theory to analyze two games played at the Paris Peace Talks of 1968-1973 by the United States, the Republic of Vietnam, and a coalition of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and the National Liberation Front. The stalemate of the first game, which lasted from the inception of the Talks in 1968 to the winter of 1971-1972, is shown to have resulted from the coincidence of the preferences of the players and from their game-theoretically defined best strategies. The article offers two interpretations of the outcome of the second game. Under the first interpretation, the two-track solution, the most-preferred alternative of the United States, is shown to have resulted from a shift in the Commumsts' preference order. Under the second, this game is shown to be vulnerable to a deceptive strategy by the United States. Under either interpretation, the optimal strategy of the United States entailed announcing that it would prefer to prolong the war rather than capitulate to the Communists.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank C. Zagare, 1977. "A Game-Theoretic Analysis Of the Vietnam Negotiations," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 21(4), pages 663-684, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:21:y:1977:i:4:p:663-684
    DOI: 10.1177/002200277702100407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002200277702100407
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002200277702100407?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frank C. Zagare, 1981. "Nonmyopic Equilibria and the Middle East Crisis of 1967," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 5(2), pages 139-162, February.
    2. Michael C. Shupe & William M. Wright & Keith W. Hipel & Niall M. Fraser, 1980. "Nationalization of the Suez Canal," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 24(3), pages 477-493, September.
    3. Roman, Mihai Daniel, 2010. "A game theoretic approach of war with financial influences," MPRA Paper 38389, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:21:y:1977:i:4:p:663-684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.