IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v18y1974i4p620-633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Regulation of Warfare

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Frei

    (Department of Political Science University of Zurich)

Abstract

The regulation of warfare as envisaged by the Hague and Geneva Conventions may be seen as a paradigm for the legal control of international conflict in general. This article suggests two complementary theoretical frameworks to explain the creation and application of norms regarding restraints in war: (a) a framework based on the theory of bargaining and (b) a framework based on the theory of integration. Each framework is described by a set of interrelated hypotheses. So far, they have the status of pre theory only.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Frei, 1974. "The Regulation of Warfare," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 18(4), pages 620-633, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:18:y:1974:i:4:p:620-633
    DOI: 10.1177/002200277401800404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002200277401800404
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002200277401800404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carl M. Stevens, 1958. "On the Theory of Negotiation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 72(1), pages 77-97.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard H. Willis & Myron L. Joseph, 1959. "Bargaining behavior. I. "Prominence" as a predictor of the outcome of games of agreement," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 3(2), pages 102-113, June.
    2. Jan Cervenka, 2019. "Bargaining Power: Significance, Structure and Development," ACTA VSFS, University of Finance and Administration, vol. 13(1), pages 79-93.
    3. Lazear, Edward P, 1983. "A Competitive Theory of Monopoly Unionism," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(4), pages 631-643, September.
    4. Yasmi, Yurdi & Kelley, Lisa & Enters, Thomas, 2011. "Forest conflict in Asia and the role of collective action in its management:," CAPRi working papers 102, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:18:y:1974:i:4:p:620-633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.