IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jfasei/v2y2020i2p159-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sino-US Disorder: Power and Policy in Post-COVID Indo-Pacific

Author

Listed:
  • Titli Basu

Abstract

Great powers have invested in order-building projects with competing vision of political values and ideologies. How the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic shapes the balance of power and order are debated. The pandemic arrived in the midst of Sino-US strategic contestation, a crumbling European project, de-globalisation and contested economic governance architecture. While the pandemic exacerbated Washington abdicating leadership role, Beijing also has alienated itself from the followers of rules based order. It has sharpened the clash of rhetoric, narratives, and perceptions. The pandemic will reorganise the international system and power structures. Situating the Indo-Pacific project in this backdrop, this article critically analyses the debates, discourses and nuanced divergences that are shaping the Indo-Pacific puzzle in the power corridors of Washington, Tokyo and Delhi, in addition to mapping Beijing’s approach to Indo-Pacific. The article evaluates the contrast in their respective visions of order, China strategy, ASEAN centrality and multilateral free-trade regimes. But these subtle departures have not restricted major Indo-Pacific powers to weave a strategic web of democracies and pursue a win-win issue-based multi-alignment on matters of mutual strategic interests. With new realities in play, the India-US-Japan triangle will feature as one of the key building blocks of Indo-Pacific to deliver on the shared responsibility of providing global public goods. JEL Codes : F5, K3

Suggested Citation

  • Titli Basu, 2020. "Sino-US Disorder: Power and Policy in Post-COVID Indo-Pacific," Journal of Asian Economic Integration, , vol. 2(2), pages 159-179, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jfasei:v:2:y:2020:i:2:p:159-179
    DOI: 10.1177/2631684620940448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2631684620940448
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2631684620940448?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ren Xiao, 2015. "A reform-minded status quo power? China, the G20, and reform of the international financial system," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(11), pages 2023-2043, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suneel Kumar, 2020. "China’s Revisionism Versus India’s Status Quoism: Strategies and Counter-strategies of Rivals in Doklam Standoff," Jadavpur Journal of International Relations, , vol. 24(1), pages 73-100, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Indo-Pacific strategy; Sino-US relations; India-US-Japan; China policy; world order;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F5 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy
    • K3 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jfasei:v:2:y:2020:i:2:p:159-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.