IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v46y2021i2p173-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commentary on “Validation Methods for Aggregate-Level Test Scale Linking: A Case Study Mapping School District Test Score Distributions to a Common Scaleâ€

Author

Listed:
  • Mark L. Davison

    (5635University of Minnesota)

Abstract

This paper begins by setting the linking methods of Reardon, Kalogrides, and Ho in the broader literature on linking. Trends in the validity data suggest that there may be a conditional bias in the estimates of district means, but the data in the article are not conclusive on this point. Further, the data used in their case study might support the validity of the methods only over a limited range of the ability continuum. Applications of the method are then discussed. Contrary to the title, the application of the linking results is not limited to aggregate-level data. Because the potential application is so broad, further research is needed on issues such as the possibility of conditional bias and the validity of estimates over the full range of possible values. Validity is not a dichotomous concept where validity exists or it does not. The evidence reported by Reardon et al. provides substantial, but incomplete, support for the validity of the linked measures in this case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark L. Davison, 2021. "Commentary on “Validation Methods for Aggregate-Level Test Scale Linking: A Case Study Mapping School District Test Score Distributions to a Common Scaleâ€," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(2), pages 173-186, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:46:y:2021:i:2:p:173-186
    DOI: 10.3102/1076998620949172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/1076998620949172
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/1076998620949172?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew D. Ho & Sean F. Reardon & Demetra Kalogrides, 2021. "Validation Methods for Aggregate-Level Test Scale Linking: A Rejoinder," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(2), pages 209-218, April.
    2. Sean F. Reardon & Demetra Kalogrides & Andrew D. Ho, 2021. "Validation Methods for Aggregate-Level Test Scale Linking: A Case Study Mapping School District Test Score Distributions to a Common Scale," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(2), pages 138-167, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew D. Ho & Sean F. Reardon & Demetra Kalogrides, 2021. "Validation Methods for Aggregate-Level Test Scale Linking: A Rejoinder," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(2), pages 209-218, April.
    2. Daniel F. McCaffrey & Steven A. Culpepper, 2021. "Introduction to JEBS Special Issue on NAEP Linked Aggregate Scores," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(2), pages 135-137, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tim Moses & Neil J. Dorans, 2021. "Aggregate-Level Test-Scale Linking: A New Solution for an Old Problem?," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(2), pages 187-202, April.
    2. Daniel F. McCaffrey & Steven A. Culpepper, 2021. "Introduction to JEBS Special Issue on NAEP Linked Aggregate Scores," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(2), pages 135-137, April.
    3. Andrew D. Ho & Sean F. Reardon & Demetra Kalogrides, 2021. "Validation Methods for Aggregate-Level Test Scale Linking: A Rejoinder," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(2), pages 209-218, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:46:y:2021:i:2:p:173-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.