IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v25y2000i1p13-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scheffé’s More Powerful F-Protected Post Hoc Procedure

Author

Listed:
  • Alan J. Klockars
  • Gregory R. Hancock

Abstract

In 1970 Henry Scheffé proposed a more powerful version of his well known post hoc multiple comparison procedure, only to fail to recommend it by the paper's end. The point of the current paper is to bring this simple modification to a wider audience, complete with an original derivation, in hopes that the method will be embraced by researchers despite its creator's hesitations. Specifically, whereas Scheffé's original (1953) procedure advocates testing any exploratory post hoc contrast or comparison using a critical value assuming k - 1 between-group degrees of freedom, Scheffé's later modification (1970) will be demonstrated here showing that a more liberal critical value assuming k - 2 between-group degrees of freedom may be used if an omnibus null hypothesis across all means has been rejected.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan J. Klockars & Gregory R. Hancock, 2000. "Scheffé’s More Powerful F-Protected Post Hoc Procedure," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 25(1), pages 13-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:25:y:2000:i:1:p:13-19
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986025001013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986025001013
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986025001013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Jiangyan & Chen, Huanxin & Liu, Jiahui & Li, Zhengfei & Huang, Ronggeng & Xing, Lu & Wang, Jiangyu & Li, Guannan, 2017. "An energy performance evaluation methodology for individual office building with dynamic energy benchmarks using limited information," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 193-205.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:25:y:2000:i:1:p:13-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.