IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intstu/v58y2021i1p80-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

NGO’s Authority: A Discussion in the Global Environmental Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaolong Zou
  • Chuan Wang

Abstract

As non-governmental organizations (NGOs) assume incrementally important roles in global environmental governance, literature regarding their functions also multiplies. Studies are available about their features, structural advantages or impacts. However, very few have sufficiently explained what makes them tick in the international system as non-state actors. In this article, we argue that NGOs’ important position in global governance lies in its authority. We build our analysis on sociological institutionalism and the principal–agent models, arguing that NGOs are independent and autonomous with both inherent authority and granted authority by sovereign states or inter-governmental organizations (IGOs). It is through this authority that NGOs could function independently and autonomously in global governance instead of being the affiliated or appendant actors of parties. To shed some new light on understanding NGOs in the international system from a theoretical perspective, we employ cases from environmental governance domain as evidence for illustration.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaolong Zou & Chuan Wang, 2021. "NGO’s Authority: A Discussion in the Global Environmental Governance," International Studies, , vol. 58(1), pages 80-97, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intstu:v:58:y:2021:i:1:p:80-97
    DOI: 10.1177/0020881720981215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020881720981215
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020881720981215?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esty, Daniel C, 1998. "Non-Governmental Organizations at the World Trade Organization: Cooperation, Competition, or Exclusion," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 123-147, March.
    2. Harriet Bulkeley, 2010. "Climate policy and governance: an editorial essay," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(3), pages 311-313, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ning Cui & Jiaxuan Li & Jun Tu & Maochun Zhou, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Non-Governmental Organizations Participating in Garbage Management under the Background of Internet of Things," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-21, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Runge, C. Ford, 2001. "A Global Environment Organization (Geo) And The World Trading System: Prospects And Problems," Working Papers 14448, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    2. John B. Coles & Jing Zhang & Jun Zhuang, 2022. "Bridging the research-practice gap in disaster relief: using the IFRC Code of Conduct to develop an aid model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 1337-1357, May.
    3. Ekardt, Felix, 2012. "Sicherung sozial-ökologischer Standards durch Partizipation: Das Beispiel nichtstaatlicher Akteure im internationalen Recht," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 264, March.
    4. Hari Bansha Dulal, 2019. "Cities in Asia: how are they adapting to climate change?," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 9(1), pages 13-24, March.
    5. Camille Parguel & Jean-Christophe Graz, 2021. "Food Can’t Be Traded: Civil Society’s Discursive Power in the Context of Agricultural Liberalisation in India," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) Working Paper 405, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi, India.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intstu:v:58:y:2021:i:1:p:80-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.