IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intstu/v56y2019i4p272-291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chile’s Peacekeeping and the Post-UN Intervention Scenario in Haiti

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Solar

Abstract

The defence and foreign policy communities in the Global South should learn from the lessons of security governance that followed the 13-year United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH). To better inform the academic and policy debate, this article extrapolates ideas from the case study of Chile, one of the ‘big four’ Latin American peacekeeping providers in Haiti, along with Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay. The article examines Chile’s finished compromise with the MINUSTAH in order to shed light on conflict intervention strategies and its peace operations in Colombia and the Central African Republic. It argues that military policies for peace intervention purposes should undergo a critical reassessment in light of the state steering away from the past use of long-term brute force. Today’s changing security environment favours a set of different human security policies that have become more prevalent for peacekeeping policymaking. Engaging in scenarios of war and peace thus demands a more focused, experienced and tactical use of military and diplomatic resources than governments in the developing countries currently possess.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Solar, 2019. "Chile’s Peacekeeping and the Post-UN Intervention Scenario in Haiti," International Studies, , vol. 56(4), pages 272-291, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intstu:v:56:y:2019:i:4:p:272-291
    DOI: 10.1177/0020881719857395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020881719857395
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020881719857395?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vincenzo Bove & Leandro Elia, 2011. "Supplying peace: Participation in and troop contribution to peacekeeping missions," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 48(6), pages 699-714, November.
    2. Institute for Economics and Peace, 2017. "Global Peace Index 2017," Working Papers id:11991, eSocialSciences.
    3. Stephen Browne & Thomas G. Weiss, 2014. "The future UN development agenda: contrasting visions, contrasting operations," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(7), pages 1326-1340, August.
    4. Paul D. Williams, 2017. "Global and Regional Peacekeepers: Trends, Opportunities, Risks and a Way Ahead," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(1), pages 124-129, February.
    5. Rogelio Madrueño-Aguilar, 2016. "Human Security and the New Global Threats: Discourse, Taxonomy and Implications," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(2), pages 156-173, May.
    6. Todd Sandler, 2017. "International Peacekeeping Operations," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(9), pages 1875-1897, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Toke S. Aidt & Facundo Albornoz & Esther Hauk, 2019. "Foreign in influence and domestic policy: A survey," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1928, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    2. Toke S. Aidt & Facundo Albornoz & Esther Hauk, 2021. "Foreign Influence and Domestic Policy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 426-487, June.
    3. Asongu, Simplice & Acha-Anyi, Paul, 2019. "Global Tourism and Waves of Terror: Perspectives from Military Expenditure," MPRA Paper 101793, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Mohamed Abdel Jelil & Kartika Bhatia & Anne Brockmeyer & Quy-Toan Do & CleÌ ment Joubert, 2018. "Unemployment and Violent Extremism: Evidence from Daesh Foreign Recruits," HiCN Working Papers 273, Households in Conflict Network.
    5. Ansink, Erik & Weikard, Hans-Peter & Withagen, Cees, 2019. "International environmental agreements with support," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 241-252.
    6. Klaus H. Goetz & Ronny Patz & Bernhard Reinsberg, 2017. "Trust Funds as a Lever of Influence at International Development Organizations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8, pages 85-95, August.
    7. Simplice A. Asongu & Jacinta C. Nwachukwu & Chris Pyke, 2019. "The Right to Life: Global Evidence on the Role of Security Officers and the Police in Modulating the Effect of Insecurity on Homicide," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 727-740, June.
    8. repec:mje:mjejnl:v:12:y:2017:i:3:p:101-118 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Kjell Hausken & John F. Moxnes, 2019. "Innovation, Development and National Indices," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 1165-1188, February.
    10. Erik Ansink & Cees A. Withagen, 2016. "Members, Joiners, Free-Riders, Supporters," CESifo Working Paper Series 5802, CESifo.
    11. Todd Sandler, 2019. "Affinity, arming, consequences, and perceptions: an introduction," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 319-327, March.
    12. Colin Hannigan, 2019. "Toward a holistic networks approach to strategic third-party intervention: A literature review," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 22(3), pages 277-292, September.
    13. Jamileh Kadivar, 2020. "Exploring Takfir, Its Origins and Contemporary Use: The Case of Takfiri Approach in Daesh’s Media," Contemporary Review of the Middle East, , vol. 7(3), pages 259-285, September.
    14. Hocine, Amine & Kouaissah, Noureddine, 2020. "XOR analytic hierarchy process and its application in the renewable energy sector," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    15. Fethi Mansouri & Amanuel Elias, 2021. "The Intercultural Dialogue Index (ICDI): An Index for Assessing Intercultural Relations," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 411-453, June.
    16. Jamie Levin & Joseph MacKay & Anne Spencer Jamison & Abouzar Nasirzadeh & Anthony Sealey, 2021. "A test of the democratic peacekeeping hypothesis: Coups, democracy, and foreign military deployments," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(3), pages 355-367, May.
    17. Wertz, Aurélie & Mbuvi, Dorcas, 2020. "Women, leadership and violent extremism: A potential security risk?," MERIT Working Papers 2020-054, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    18. Caroline Buts & Cind Du Bois, 2017. "Military deployment and international terrorism: do location and mission type matter?," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 621-633, November.
    19. Andrew Levin, 2021. "Peacekeeper Fatalities and Force Commitments to UN Operations," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 38(3), pages 292-315, May.
    20. Min Ye & Quan Li, 2023. "Examining UN PKO contributions at multiple levels," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 67(2-3), pages 349-374, February.
    21. Dare Ojo Omonijo* & Olusola B. Okunlola & Oliver Onyekwere C. Uche & Michael C. Anyaegbunam & Jonathan A. Odukoya & Elizabeth I. Olowookere & Olusola Joshua Olujobi, 2018. "An Exploratory Study of Modeling as an Educational Tool for Adolescent Moral Development," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 276-288:4.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intstu:v:56:y:2019:i:4:p:272-291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.