IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intare/v26y2023i4p319-340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taking the developmental state seriously: Why South Korea outperformed neoliberal regulatory states in rapid coronavirus disease 2019 vaccinations and saving lives

Author

Listed:
  • Rajiv Kumar

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 claimed more than three million lives worldwide in 2020, giving national governments the most urgent task for 2021 to achieve high vaccination rates to save lives. The World Health Organization declared that “vaccines are the most critical tool to end the pandemic and save lives.†In this context, South Korea (hereafter, Korea) achieved a remarkable milestone by outperforming the United Kingdom and the United States in vaccinations rate, where the world's earliest vaccination programs started. Thanks to its high vaccination rate, Korea recorded less than 100 deaths per million populations in 2021 compared to more than 1000 in the United Kingdom and the United States. Why Korea leaped ahead of the United Kingdom and the United States in rapid vaccinations that saved many lives? To answer this question, I first conceptualize contemporary Korea as a developmental state which retained its institutional capacity despite its transition from authoritarianism to liberal democracy, distinguishing it from the UK and the US's neoliberal regulatory states, where reforms hallowed out state capacity. I then advance two core claims. First , Korea surpassed the United Kingdom and the United States in vaccine rollout because of its developmental state-type goal-oriented autonomous policymaking and strong institutional capacity, manifested as Korea's central agency deployed a command and control vaccination program led by a coherent health bureaucracy. Second , the Korean state's strategic intervention in the market and its capacity to foster public–private partnerships to realize national goals boosted its vaccinations. Finally, the paper suggests how neoliberal regulatory states in the global north can learn lessons from the Korean experience in rebuilding state capacity to deal with the future global pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajiv Kumar, 2023. "Taking the developmental state seriously: Why South Korea outperformed neoliberal regulatory states in rapid coronavirus disease 2019 vaccinations and saving lives," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 26(4), pages 319-340, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:26:y:2023:i:4:p:319-340
    DOI: 10.1177/22338659231194941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22338659231194941
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/22338659231194941?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sung-Young Kim, 2019. "Hybridized industrial ecosystems and the makings of a new developmental infrastructure in East Asia’s green energy sector," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 158-182, January.
    2. Linda Weiss & Elizabeth Thurbon, 2021. "Developmental State or Economic Statecraft? Where, Why and How the Difference Matters," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 472-489, May.
    3. Rajiv Kumar, 2021. "Bringing the developmental state back in: explaining South Korea’s successful management of COVID-19," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(7), pages 1397-1416, July.
    4. Linda Weiss & Elizabeth Thurbon, 2022. "Explaining divergent National Responses to Covid-19: An Enhanced State Capacity Framework," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 697-712, July.
    5. Majone, Giandomenico, 1997. "From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 139-167, May.
    6. Elizabeth Thurbon & Linda Weiss, 2021. "Economic statecraft at the frontier: Korea’s drive for intelligent robotics," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 103-127, January.
    7. Sung-Young Kim, 2012. "Transitioning from fast-follower to innovator: The institutional foundations of the Korean telecommunications sector," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 140-168.
    8. Lee Jones & Shahar Hameiri, 2022. "COVID-19 and the failure of the neoliberal regulatory state," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 1027-1052, July.
    9. Robyn Klingler-Vidra & Ramon Pacheco Pardo, 2020. "Legitimate Social Purpose and South Korea’s Support for Entrepreneurial Finance Since the Asian Financial Crisis," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 337-353, April.
    10. Robert H. Wade, 2018. "The Developmental State: Dead or Alive?," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(2), pages 518-546, March.
    11. Yin-wah Chu, 2021. "Democratization, globalization, and institutional adaptation: the developmental states of South Korea and Taiwan," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 59-80, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomic, Slobodan & Dragicevic, Ognjen, 2023. "An Unexpected Fate of a Regulatory State at the EU’s Gate: Internationalisation and Non-Consolidation of the Serbian Regulatory State," SocArXiv 7g9zx, Center for Open Science.
    2. Frank Siedlok & Natasha Hamilton‐Hart & Hsiao‐Chen Shen, 2022. "Taiwan's COVID‐19 Response: The Interdependence of State and Private Sector Institutions," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(1), pages 190-216, January.
    3. Ian Loader & Adam White, 2017. "How can we better align private security with the public interest? Towards a civilizing model of regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 166-184, June.
    4. Bartle, Ian & Vass, Peter, 2007. "Independent economic regulation: A reassessment of its role in sustainable development," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 261-269, December.
    5. Cunha, Bruno Queiroz & Pereira, Ana Karine & Gomide, Alexandre de Ávila, 2017. "State capacity and utilities regulation in Brazil: Exploring bureaucracy," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 116-126.
    6. Anders Cour & Holger Højlund, 2017. "Polyphonic Supervision," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 148-162, March.
    7. Minogue, Martin, 2005. "Apples and Oranges: Problems in the Analysis of Comparative Regulatory Governance," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30589, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    8. Kirkpatrick, Colin & Parker, David, 2004. "Regulation and the Privatisation of Water Services in Developing Countries: Assessing the Impact of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS)," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30600, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    9. Tyce, Matthew, 2020. "Beyond the neoliberal-statist divide on the drivers of innovation: A political settlements reading of Kenya’s M-Pesa success story," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    10. Dimitar Anguelov, 2024. "State‐owned Enterprises and the Politics of Financializing Infrastructure Development in Indonesia: De‐risking at the Limit?," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 55(3), pages 493-529, May.
    11. Gary Gereffi, 2020. "What does the COVID-19 pandemic teach us about global value chains? The case of medical supplies," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(3), pages 287-301, September.
    12. Larson, James F. & Park, Jaemin, 2014. "From developmental to network state: Government restructuring and ICT-led innovation in Korea," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 344-359.
    13. Andrea Goldstein & José Claudio Linhares Pires, 2006. "Brazilian Regulatory Agencies: Early Appraisal and Looming Challenges," Chapters, in: Edmund Amann (ed.), Regulating Development, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Cheng, Kuo-Tai, 2013. "Governance mechanisms and regulation in the utilities: An investigation in a Taiwan sample," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 17-22.
    15. Anthony Lloyd & Daniel Briggs & Anthony Ellis & Luke Telford, 2024. "Critical Reflections on the COVID-19 Pandemic from the NHS Frontline," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 29(1), pages 83-100, March.
    16. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:46:y:2008:i::p:849-874 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Flavia Donadelli & Bruno Q. Cunha & Mauricio I. Dussauge‐Laguna, 2020. "‘Post‐NPM’ by force or fiat? A comparison of administrative reform trajectories in Brazil and Mexico1," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(5), pages 255-266, December.
    18. Bulfone, Fabio, 2020. "The political economy of industrial policy in the European Union," MPIfG Discussion Paper 20/12, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    19. Valenzuela, Jose Maria, 2023. "State ownership in liberal economic governance? De-risking private investment in the electricity sector in Mexico," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    20. Minogue, Martin, 2008. "What connects regulatory governance to poverty?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 189-201, May.
    21. Marion Podesta & Jean-Christophe Poudou & Michel Roland, 2021. "The Price Impact of Energy Vouchers," The Energy Journal, , vol. 42(3), pages 27-54, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:26:y:2023:i:4:p:319-340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hufs.ac.kr/user/hufsenglish/re_1.jsp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.