IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intare/v24y2021i3p241-251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of foreign public evaluations of the US Presidents on the favorability toward the country

Author

Listed:
  • Eun Bin Kim
  • Jinhwan Oh

Abstract

This study examines how international publics’ evaluations of US Presidents affect the favorability of their views of the US. More specifically, it investigates the impact of the US Presidents George W. Bush, Barak Obama and Donald Trump on attitudes toward the US in 32 nations. It analyzes the data from Pew Research Center’s Global Indicators Database on opinions of the US and confidence in the US President from 2002 to 2018. The analysis reveals a significant relationship between confidence in the US Presidents and favorable attitudes toward the US among foreign publics. The paper further discusses the implications of global evaluations of US Presidents for US public diplomacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Eun Bin Kim & Jinhwan Oh, 2021. "The impact of foreign public evaluations of the US Presidents on the favorability toward the country," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 24(3), pages 241-251, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:24:y:2021:i:3:p:241-251
    DOI: 10.1177/22338659211013658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22338659211013658
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/22338659211013658?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nye, Joseph S., 2008. "Public Diplomacy and Soft Power," Scholarly Articles 11738397, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    2. Benjamin Goldsmith & Yusaku Horiuchi, 2011. "In Search of Soft Power: Does Foreign Public Opinion Matter for U.S. Foreign Policy," Crawford School Research Papers 1108, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianhong Qi & Kam Ki Tang & Da Yin & Yong Zhao, 2020. "Remaking China’s Global Image with the Belt and Road Initiative: Is the Jury Out?," Discussion Papers Series 635, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    2. Patalakh Artem, 2016. "Assessment of Soft Power Strategies: Towards an Aggregative Analytical Model for Country-Focused Case Study Research," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 22(76), pages 85-112, October.
    3. Nyam Elisha Yakubu, 2022. "An Appraisal of Hard Power in Contemporary Practice of Diplomacy," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(02), pages 342-351, February.
    4. Acosta, Matias & Szlamka, Zsofia & Mostajo-Radji, Mohammed A., 2020. "Transnational youth networks: an evolving form of public diplomacy to accelerate the Sustainable Development Goals," SocArXiv 8247s, Center for Open Science.
    5. Michail Ploumis, 2018. "A New Way Forward: Rebalancing the U.S. Security Cooperation with Greece in a Fast Changing Geostrategic Environment," Applied Finance and Accounting, Redfame publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 95-111, February.
    6. Yazeed Abdullah Almahraj, 2023. "British press coverage of international sports events hosted by Saudi Arabia: content analysis study in light of country concept model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    7. Moran Yarchi & Tal Samuel-Azran & Lidor Bar-David, 2017. "Facebook users’ engagement with Israel’s public diplomacy messages during the 2012 and 2014 military operations in Gaza," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(4), pages 360-375, November.
    8. Arijit Mazumdar, 2020. "India’s Public Diplomacy in the Twenty-First Century: Components, Objectives and Challenges," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 76(1), pages 24-39, March.
    9. Steven L. Pike, 2023. "What diplomats do: US citizen perspectives on the work of public diplomacy," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(4), pages 442-455, December.
    10. Mihails Potapovs, 2024. "Place branding: is it public policy, or isn’t it?," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 275-292, September.
    11. Xiang Jun & Primiano Christopher B. & Huang Wei-hao, 2015. "Aggressive or Peaceful Rise? An Empirical Assessment of China’s Militarized Conflict, 1979–2010," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 21(3), pages 301-325, August.
    12. Asmus, Gerda & Eichenauer, Vera & Fuchs, Andreas & Parks, Bradley, 2021. "Does India use development finance to compete with China? A subnational analysis," Kiel Working Papers 2189, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    13. Suter, Mariana Bassi & Borini, Felipe Mendes & Floriani, Dinorá Eliete & da Silva, Dirceu & Polo, Edison, 2018. "Country-of-origin image (COI) as a country-specific advantage (CSA): Scale development and validation of COI as a resource within the firm perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 46-58.
    14. Iván Goldman, 2024. "North Korea’s ‘New DPRK’ YouTube channel: new public diplomacy attempt or international propaganda? A case study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    15. Li Zhang, 2020. "Research progress in Chinese perceptions of the EU: a critical review and methodological reflection," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 17-34, March.
    16. Tiwari, Rajnish & Prabhu, Jaideep, 2018. "Soft power of frugal innovation and its potential role in India's emergence as a global lead market for affordable excellence," Working Papers 104, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    17. Nisha Garud-Patkar, 2022. "Mediated Public Diplomacy: Frame-building Contest Between the United States and Pakistan During a Conflict," International Studies, , vol. 59(1), pages 58-75, January.
    18. Michał Marcin Kobierecki, 2021. "Aviation diplomacy: a conceptual framework for analyzing the relationship between aviation and international relations," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 293-303, December.
    19. Sirirat Ngamsang, 2013. "Confucius Institutes as Instruments of Soft Power: Comparison with International Rivals," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 4(10).
    20. Jacklyne Achieng' Aput & Anita Ndoti Kiamba & Peter Kagwanja, 2023. "Public Diplomacy in Regional Integration: Strategizing Policy Goals," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(10), pages 368-384, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:24:y:2021:i:3:p:241-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hufs.ac.kr/user/hufsenglish/re_1.jsp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.