IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intare/v24y2021i2p97-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The US–South Korea alliance: How the patron benefits from the protégé

Author

Listed:
  • Sojeong Lee
  • Brandon Prins
  • Krista E. Wiegand

Abstract

Since the end of World War II, the US military has continuously deployed troops to South Korea. The alliance works as an asymmetrical alliance, where the US is a patron and South Korea is a protégé. While it is argued that this deployment has significant political, economic, and military effects on South Korea and the region, few studies have examined how the presence of US forces there enhances US military and economic power as well as national security interests. In this paper, we examine the costs and benefits of the US–South Korea alliance, specifically focusing on US troop deployment on the Korean Peninsula. In particular, we argue that the US military alliance with South Korea has significant benefits to both partners, but particularly for the sake of US national security interests. In this sense, the protégé state provides significant benefits to the patron state. We discuss the strategic importance of South Korea in US foreign policy in the region and emphasize the benefits of the US–South Korea alliance at the various levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Sojeong Lee & Brandon Prins & Krista E. Wiegand, 2021. "The US–South Korea alliance: How the patron benefits from the protégé," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 24(2), pages 97-117, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:24:y:2021:i:2:p:97-117
    DOI: 10.1177/22338659211018325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22338659211018325
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/22338659211018325?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ray, James Lee, 1989. "The abolition of slavery and the end of international war," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 405-439, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gary Goertz & Paul F. Diehl, 1992. "Toward a Theory of International Norms," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(4), pages 634-664, December.
    2. Harvey Starr, 1991. "Democratic Dominoes," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(2), pages 356-381, June.
    3. Stephen G. Brooks, 1999. "The Globalization of Production and the Changing Benefits of Conquest," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 43(5), pages 646-670, October.
    4. Susumu Suzuki & Volker Krause & J. David Singer, 2002. "The Correlates of War Project: a Bibliographic History of the Scientific Study of War and Peace, 1964-2000," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 19(2), pages 69-107, September.
    5. James Lee Ray, 2002. "Does Interstate War Have A Future?," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 19(1), pages 53-80, February.
    6. Randolph M. Siverson & Juliann Emmons, 1991. "Birds of a Feather," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(2), pages 285-306, June.
    7. Eberwein, Wolf-Dieter & Chojnacki, Sven, 1999. "The capacity and willingness to act: Two constitutive elements of strategy design," Discussion Papers, Research Group International Politics P 99-303, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:24:y:2021:i:2:p:97-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hufs.ac.kr/user/hufsenglish/re_1.jsp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.