IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v43y1989i03p405-439_03.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The abolition of slavery and the end of international war

Author

Listed:
  • Ray, James Lee

Abstract

Slavery and war have both historically been considered inevitable consequences of human nature. Yet slavery has been abolished, and moral progress may have contributed to slavery's disappearance. Both realists and Marxists are skeptical about the impact of ethical constraints on political decisions, while idealists as well as at least some regime analysts emphasize the role of those constraints. However, elements of all of these approaches support the proposition that moral progress may bring an end to international war.Some historical trends do not support the idea that international war is on the verge of disappearance, but there has not been a war between major powers since 1945. In addition, norms against colonialism are strong. No war has occurred between democratic states, nor does a war appear likely among the rather sizable number of industrialized democratic states in the international system today. Explanations of these pockets of peace based on caution induced by nuclear weapons or on economic interdependence, for example, are certainly not beyond question. Therefore, it may be that norms inhibiting the initiation of international war have already made obsolete not only wars between the richest and most powerful states in the world but also some forms of depradation by the strong against the relatively weak states.

Suggested Citation

  • Ray, James Lee, 1989. "The abolition of slavery and the end of international war," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 405-439, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:43:y:1989:i:03:p:405-439_03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020818300032987/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sojeong Lee & Brandon Prins & Krista E. Wiegand, 2021. "The US–South Korea alliance: How the patron benefits from the protégé," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 24(2), pages 97-117, June.
    2. Susumu Suzuki & Volker Krause & J. David Singer, 2002. "The Correlates of War Project: a Bibliographic History of the Scientific Study of War and Peace, 1964-2000," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 19(2), pages 69-107, September.
    3. Randolph M. Siverson & Juliann Emmons, 1991. "Birds of a Feather," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(2), pages 285-306, June.
    4. Harvey Starr, 1991. "Democratic Dominoes," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(2), pages 356-381, June.
    5. Stephen G. Brooks, 1999. "The Globalization of Production and the Changing Benefits of Conquest," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 43(5), pages 646-670, October.
    6. James Lee Ray, 2002. "Does Interstate War Have A Future?," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 19(1), pages 53-80, February.
    7. Eberwein, Wolf-Dieter & Chojnacki, Sven, 1999. "The capacity and willingness to act: Two constitutive elements of strategy design," Discussion Papers, Research Group International Politics P 99-303, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Gary Goertz & Paul F. Diehl, 1992. "Toward a Theory of International Norms," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(4), pages 634-664, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:43:y:1989:i:03:p:405-439_03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.