IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intare/v18y2015i1p53-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade facilitation and the regulatory environment in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Yoon Heo

    (Graduate School of International Studies, Sogang University, Korea)

  • Roman Vernidub

    (CEO, KORU Global, Seoul, Korea)

Abstract

The Russian government has already introduced some advanced trade facilitation (TF) measures, following the experience of developed countries. However, there have been no serious attempts made yet to conduct a comprehensive study of the TF environment to show a whole picture of the issue in Russia and identify the bottlenecks in its development path. This study centers on the following three questions. First, what is the current status of TF in Russia? Second, what is the regulatory environment where TF is found? Third, what policy implications can we derive from the study? To this end, this study examines the processes connected with the importation, exportation and transit of goods in Russia. It also evaluates TF-related policies, regulations, and the challenges ahead for Russia, and finally suggests some policy recommendations for the Russian government. As part of the UNESCAP TF unit, we adopted the expert survey approach to collect the data because this method is particularly useful in providing some independent assessment on complex, technical and specialized issues for which data is not readily available. Our in-depth investigation finds that the de facto implementation of many general measures is lagging far behind the legislation. In practice, it is not clear for traders how some regulations and processes work for them, or how easily those measures can be applied to their transactions. Bureaucracy and corruption remain very harmful factors, entailing higher trade costs in Russia. The most serious challenges faced by Russia in implementing TF measures are indicated as the lack of coordination between government agencies and the deficiency of political will . It is possible that local government agencies can start to undertake local initiatives and promote TF, but without centralized coordination among local agencies by Moscow, backed up by a strong political will, successful implementation of TF policies may not be achieved. Increasing the consultations with stakeholders through a national TF body, establishment of national single window, including an electronic one, and other measures such as risk management to improve the procedures and works of customs, should be prioritized in Russia.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoon Heo & Roman Vernidub, 2015. "Trade facilitation and the regulatory environment in Russia," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 18(1), pages 53-72, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:18:y:2015:i:1:p:53-72
    DOI: 10.1177/2233865914562255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2233865914562255
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2233865914562255?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P., Srinivasan & M., Kalaivani, 2013. "Stock Market Linkages in Emerging Asia-Pacific Markets," MPRA Paper 45871, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Michael, Bryane & Popov, Maja, 2012. "Do Customs Trade Facilitation Programmes Help Reduce Customs-Related Corruption?," EconStor Preprints 109021, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    3. Vinokurov, Evgeny & Dzhadraliyev, Murat & Shcherbanin, Yuriy, 2009. "The EurAsEC Transport Corridors," MPRA Paper 20908, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Evdokia Moïsé & Silvia Sorescu, 2013. "Trade Facilitation Indicators: The Potential Impact of Trade Facilitation on Developing Countries' Trade," OECD Trade Policy Papers 144, OECD Publishing.
    5. Evdokia Moïsé & Thomas Orliac & Peter Minor, 2011. "Trade Facilitation Indicators: The Impact on Trade Costs," OECD Trade Policy Papers 118, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fontagné, Lionel & Foure, Jean, 2016. "Is Trade Facilitation a Free Lunch? A General Equilibrium Approach," Conference papers 332757, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    2. Beverelli, Cosimo & Ticku, Rohit, 2022. "Reducing tariff evasion: The role of trade facilitation," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 534-554.
    3. Lionel Fontagné & Gianluca Orefice & Roberta Piermartini, 2020. "Making small firms happy? The heterogeneous effect of trade facilitation measures," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 565-598, August.
    4. Flentø, Daniel & Ponte, Stefano, 2017. "Least-Developed Countries in a World of Global Value Chains: Are WTO Trade Negotiations Helping?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 366-374.
    5. Beverelli, Cosimo & Neumueller, Simon & Teh, Robert, 2015. "Export Diversification Effects of the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 293-310.
    6. Beverelli, Cosimo & Neumüller, Simon & Teh, Robert, 2014. "A new look at the extensive trade margin effects of trade facilitation," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2014-16, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    7. Katerina TOÅ EVSKA-TRPÄŒEVSKA & Dragan TEVDOVSKI, 2016. "Trade Facilitation Indicators And Their Potential Impact On Trade Between The Countries Of South-Eastern Europe," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 63(3), pages 347-362, November.
    8. Russell Hillberry & Carlos Zurita, 2022. "Commitment behaviour in the World Trade Organization's Trade Facilitation Agreement," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 36-75, January.
    9. repec:wsr:wpaper:y:2015:i:137 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Bryan Roberts & Fynnwin Prager & Charles Baschnagel & Adam Rose & Brett Shears, 2021. "The economic benefits of trade facilitation: U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Centers of Excellence and Expertise programme," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 346-366, February.
    11. Mamta Kumari & Nalin Bharti, 2020. "What Drive Trade Costs? South Asia and Beyond," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 21(2), pages 258-280, September.
    12. Kudzai Mataba & Faizel Ismail, 2021. "COVID-19 and trade facilitation in Southern Africa: Implications for the AfCFTA," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2021-67, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    13. Jaime DE MELO & Laurent WAGNER, 2016. "Aid for Trade and the Trade Facilitation Agreement: What they can do for LDCs," Working Papers P153, FERDI.
    14. Kazuhiro Sugie & Massimo Geloso Grosso & Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Sébastien Miroudot & Frédéric Gonzales & Dorothée Rouzet, 2015. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Logistics Services," OECD Trade Policy Papers 183, OECD Publishing.
    15. Åsa Johansson & Eduardo Olaberría, 2014. "Global Trade and Specialisation Patterns Over the Next 50 Years," OECD Economic Policy Papers 10, OECD Publishing.
    16. Bernard Hoekman & Dominique Njinkeu, 2017. "Integrating Africa: Some Trade Policy Research Priorities and Challenges," RSCAS Working Papers 2017/43, European University Institute.
    17. Abdullah Alhassan & Mary E. Burfisher & Mr. Julian T Chow & Ding Ding & Fabio Di Vittorio & Dmitriy Kovtun & Arnold McIntyre & Ms. Inci Ötker & Marika Santoro & Lulu Shui & Karim Youssef, 2020. "Is the Whole Greater than the Sum of its Parts? Strengthening Caribbean Regional Integration," IMF Working Papers 2020/008, International Monetary Fund.
    18. Adomako, Samuel & Abdelgawad, Sondos G. & Ahsan, Mujtaba & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Azaaviele Liedong, Tahiru, 2023. "Nonmarket strategy in emerging markets: The link between SMEs’ corporate political activity, corporate social responsibility, and firm competitiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    19. Bernard Hoekman & Ben Shepherd, 2013. "Who Profits From Trade Facilitation Initiatives?," RSCAS Working Papers 2013/49, European University Institute.
    20. Muhammad Hanif & Ariba Sabah, 2020. "Stock Markets’ Integration in Post Financial Crisis Era: Evidence from Literature," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 28(2), pages 43-71.
    21. repec:unt:escsti:sti85 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Beckman, Jayson, 2021. "Reforming Market Access in Agricultural Trade: Tariff Removal and the Trade Facilitation Agreement," Economic Research Report 327196, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Trade facilitation; trade in Russia; NTFB; NSW; UNESCAP;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F63 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:18:y:2015:i:1:p:53-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hufs.ac.kr/user/hufsenglish/re_1.jsp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.