IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indqtr/v76y2020i2p243-275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indo-Nepal Trade and Investment: An Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Nisha Taneja

    (Nisha Taneja is Professor at Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations. Her broad areas of interest include WTO issues, regional trade, industrial economics, and institutional economics. In recent years she has worked on tariffs, non-tariff barriers, and transport issues related to India-Nepal, India-Sri Lanka, India-Pakistan, India-Bhutan, India-Korea, India-Japan, India-China and sub-regional cooperation between India, Bangladesh and Myanmar.)

  • Shravani Prakash

    (Shravani Prakash is an Independent Consultant on Economic and Trade Policy Research. She has more than 15 years of experience in policy-oriented research in India on areas including regional trade in South Asia, trade and transport facilitation, non-tariff barriers, informal trade, WTO and trade policy issues, FTAs, trade in services; among others. She was earlier Research Associate at Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) and has been a short-term consultant with World Bank in India. She holds a Masters in Economics from University of Warwick.)

  • Samridhi Bimal

    (Samridhi Bimal is Fellow at ICRIER, New Delhi. She has over eight years of research expertise on international trade and trade policy issues related to the WTO, regional trading agreements and domestic trade policies. She has worked extensively on South Asia on a wide array of issues including trade, investment, transport facilitation, non-tariff barriers and informal trade. She has also been associated with the World Bank as a Short-term Consultant for their programme on Regional Integration in South Asia. Her research areas of interest include international trade, development policy and regional economics. She holds a PhD in Economics from Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.)

  • Sakshi Garg

    (Sakshi Garg is a Research Assistant at Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), Delhi. She is doing policy-oriented research on issues pertaining to Economic Integration in South and South-East Asia. The themes she has worked on include Regional trade, Trade Facilitation, Informal Trade and Connectivity. She holds a Master’s degree in International Business Economics and Finance from Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics and a B.A. (Hons.) in Economics from Gargi College, University of Delhi. Her broad research interests include Trade and Development and WTO issues.)

  • Riya Roy

    (Riya Roy is currently a graduate student at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva. She is pursuing a Master in International Affairs specialising in Trade and Finance. She has a Bachelor’s degree in Economics from IPCW, University of Delhi. At ICRIER, she has actively worked on international trade and investment policies, regional trade agreements and South Asian connectivity and integration. She is currently working with the WTO as a Capstone student researcher on opportunities and challenges of shifting from consensus-based decision making to Plurilateral Joint Initiatives. Her broad research interests include trade policies, WTO issues, formalisation of informal trade, development, and gender.)

Abstract

India and Nepal have traditionally shared a unique relationship of friendship and economic cooperation. The relationship is characterised by an open and people-friendly border and is built on shared historical, cultural, linguistic and ethnic links between people residing in India and Nepal. With Nepal being a priority under India ‘Neighborhood First’ policy, strengthening the economic relationship holds immense significance and potential for both the countries. While the political relations between India and Nepal have been extensively studied, there is not much literature that explores the economic relationship between the two nations. This is an important issue to study, as India is Nepal’s largest export market, the biggest source of its imports, the top investor of foreign capital stock and among the largest donors of foreign aid. India also provides Nepal transit facility through its territory to access seaports for trading with the rest of the world. Given this, the main objective of this article is to suggest policy measures, which can increase bilateral trade and investment between India and Nepal. The article analyses the bilateral trade patterns and estimates the maximum additional trade potential. A wide range of issues of importance pertaining to bilateral trade, including tariffs, levy of an agricultural reform fee, under utilisation of the tariff rate quota, non-tariff measures, issues related to Rules of Origin (ROO) and physical barriers to cross-border movement of goods are discussed. The trends and changing sectoral composition of India’s investment in Nepal and barriers and opportunities for Indian investment in Nepal are also analysed. The article concludes by charting a way forward for bolstering economic cooperation between the two countries by listing down recommendations for enhancing trade, addressing non-tariff barriers, upgrading infrastructure to improve connectivity and enhancing Indian FDI in Nepal. JEL Classification: F10, F13, F15, F50, F53, P45

Suggested Citation

  • Nisha Taneja & Shravani Prakash & Samridhi Bimal & Sakshi Garg & Riya Roy, 2020. "Indo-Nepal Trade and Investment: An Analysis," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 76(2), pages 243-275, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:indqtr:v:76:y:2020:i:2:p:243-275
    DOI: 10.1177/0974928420917799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0974928420917799
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0974928420917799?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shiro Armstrong, 2007. "Measuring Trade and Trade Potential: A Survey," Asia Pacific Economic Papers 368, Australia-Japan Research Centre, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jai Prakash Yadav & Bimlesh Singh, 2024. "India’s Export Potential to Southern African Customs Union," Insight on Africa, , vol. 16(1), pages 22-45, January.
    2. Attasit Pankaew & Suppawit Kaewkhunok, 2022. "The new equation of South Asia region: The rising role of China in Nepal's foreign policy," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 25(2), pages 121-137, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fourie, Johan & Santana-Gallego, María, 2011. "The impact of mega-sport events on tourist arrivals," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1364-1370.
    2. Guangji Tong & Rui Hong & Lei Shi, 2023. "The Growth Effect and Its Influencing Factors: Empirical Evidence Regarding China’s Fruit and Vegetable Exports to RCEP Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Pengfei Chu & Guanxia Xie & Zhenyun Liu, 2020. "Research on the Export Potential of China’s Equipment Manufacturing Products to Countries Along the Belt and Road," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(10), pages 105-105, October.
    4. Nobuaki Yamashita, 2010. "International Fragmentation of Production," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13615.
    5. Hai Nguyen & Thang Doan, 2017. "The ASEAN Free Trade Agreement and Vietnam’s Trade Efficiency," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(4), pages 192-192, April.
    6. Juan Du & Yuan Liu & Shanna Luo & Xin Luo, 2024. "A Study on the Trade Efficiency and Potential of China’s Agricultural Products Export to Association of South East Asian Nations Countries: Empirical Analysis Based on Segmented Products," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Nguyen Xuan Trung & Nguyen Duc Hung & Nguyen Thi Hien, 2018. "Exploiting the Trade Potential from Integration: Analysing the Impact of Free Trade Agreements between ASEAN and India and China," China Report, , vol. 54(4), pages 442-466, November.
    8. Johan Fourie & María Santana-Gallego, 2013. "The determinants of African tourism," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 347-366, September.
    9. Groizard, José Luis & Marques, Helena & Santana, María, 2014. "Islands in trade: Disentangling distance from border effects," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 8, pages 1-46.
    10. Zwinkels, Remco C.J. & Beugelsdijk, Sjoerd, 2010. "Gravity equations: Workhorse or Trojan horse in explaining trade and FDI patterns across time and space?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 102-115, February.
    11. Xu, Jiayue & Lu, Caiwu & Ruan, Shunling & Xiong, Neal N., 2022. "Estimating the efficiency and potential of China's steel products export to countries along the “Belt and Road” under interconnection: An application of extended stochastic frontier gravity model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    12. Surender Kumar & Prerna Prabhakar, 2017. "India’s Trade Potential and Free Trade Agreements: A Stochastic Frontier Gravity Approach," Global Economy Journal (GEJ), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Yuee Li & Jingdong Li, 2021. "How Does China’s Economic Policy Uncertainty Affect the Sustainability of Its Net Grain Imports?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Henry Chun Kwok Lei, 2017. "The Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA) and its impacts on the export efficiency of Hong Kong and Macao," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 141-163, April.
    15. Shiro Armstrong, 2013. "Taiwan's Asia Pacific economic strategies after the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 98-114.
    16. Shiro Armstrong & Peter Drysdale & Kaliappa Kalirajan, 2008. "Asian Trade Structures and Trade Potential : An Initial Analysis of South and East Asian Trade," EABER Working Papers 21753, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    17. Swapan K. Bhattacharya & Gouranga G. Das, 2014. "Can South–South Trade Agreements Reduce Development Deficits?," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 9(3), pages 253-285, December.
    18. Evelyn S. Devadason & Shujaat Mubarik, 2020. "ASEAN and the EU: an assessment of interregional trade potentials," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 705-726, July.
    19. Doan, Thang N. & Xing, Yuqing, 2018. "Trade efficiency, free trade agreements and rules of origin," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 33-41.
    20. T. Hai H. & N. Thang D. & Т. Хаи Х. & Н. Тханг Д., 2017. "Соглашение О Свободной Торговле Асеан И Эффективность Внешнеэкономической Деятельности Вьетнама // The Asean Free Trade Agreement And Vietnam’S Trade Efficiency," Review of Business and Economics Studies // Review of Business and Economics Studies, Финансовый Университет // Financial University, vol. 5(1), pages 60-69.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    India–Nepal; bilateral trade; bilateral investment; trade in services; non-tariff barriers;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F50 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - General
    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations
    • P45 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - International Linkages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indqtr:v:76:y:2020:i:2:p:243-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.