IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/inafri/v10y2018i2p194-214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Reasons behind Nelson Mandela’s Call for a Negotiated Settlement of the Congolese Conflict and Its Critics

Author

Listed:
  • Sehlare Makgetlaneng

Abstract

This article provides key reasons behind Nelson Mandela’s call for a negotiated settlement of the Congolese conflict and its critics. Mandela regarded a negotiated settlement of the Congolese conflict as a viable means to pave a way for the political governance of the Congolese society conducive for the advancement of human rights, democracy and development of its people. Central to his policy approach was his call for the right of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to its national self-determination and the free, independent exercise of its sovereignty and domestic and foreign policies in the interests of its people and for this right to be respected by its neighbouring countries and other countries in Africa and globally. This was a best way of ensuring that the Congolese were to resolve their national conflict without the interference of external actors. This meant resolving conflicts among themselves and with their neighbours. Mandela’s policy approach towards the resolution of the Congolese conflict was based on the situation of the Great Lakes, the strategy and tactics of the USA and its regional allies and the strategic importance of the DRC to the continental transformation. Arguments advanced by its critics against it were ignorant of these issues, processes and developments. They did not serve the struggle for human rights, democracy, development and political governance of the Congolese society conducive for their advancement. These problems still remain in place in the DRC. South Africa’s policy approach towards the Congolese conflict prevailed over that of those who opposed it. Thabo Mbeki, upon becoming the national president, continued with this policy, pursued under the leadership of Mandela, aimed at a negotiated settlement of the DRC conflict. It led to a transitional government of national unity that was brought to an end by the results of the 2006 elections.

Suggested Citation

  • Sehlare Makgetlaneng, 2018. "Key Reasons behind Nelson Mandela’s Call for a Negotiated Settlement of the Congolese Conflict and Its Critics," Insight on Africa, , vol. 10(2), pages 194-214, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:inafri:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:194-214
    DOI: 10.1177/0975087818776164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0975087818776164
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0975087818776164?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Assis Malaquias, 2001. "Making war & lots of money: the political economy of protracted conflict in Angola," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(90), pages 521-536.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristina Udelsmann Rodrigues & Patience Mususa & Karen Büscher & Jeroen Cuvelier, 2021. "Boomtown Urbanization and Rural-Urban Transformation in Mining and Conflict Regions in Angola, the DRC and Zambia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Ricardo Cardoso & Jia‐Ching Chen & Henrik Ernstson, 2023. "BLOCOS URBANISM: Capitalism and Modularity in the Making of Contemporary Luanda," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 809-832, September.
    3. Jamal M. Moosa, 2012. "Protracted Conflicts and Rehabilitation," Insight on Africa, , vol. 4(1), pages 19-34, January.
    4. Raul Caruso, 2010. "Butter, Guns And Ice-Cream Theory And Evidence From Sub-Saharan Africa," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 269-283.
    5. Adedapo O. Adeola & Adedibu S. Akingboye & Odunayo T. Ore & Oladotun A. Oluwajana & Adetola H. Adewole & David B. Olawade & Abimbola C. Ogunyele, 2022. "Crude oil exploration in Africa: socio-economic implications, environmental impacts, and mitigation strategies," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 26-50, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:inafri:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:194-214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.