IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v78y2025i1p37-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Days of Work over a Half Century: The Rise of the Four-Day Workweek

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel S. Hamermesh
  • Jeff E. Biddle

Abstract

The authors examine work patterns in the United States from 1973 to 2018, with the novel focus on days per week, using intermittent CPS samples and one ATUS sample. Among full-time workers, the incidence of four-day workweeks tripled, adding 7 million four-day workers. Similar growth occurred in the Netherlands, Germany, and South Korea. The rise was not due to changes in demographics or industrial structure. Such schedules are more common among those who are 1) less educated, 2) younger, 3) white non-Hispanic, 4) men, 5) natives, 6) people with young children, 7) non-unionized, 8) police and firefighters, 9) health care workers, and 10) restaurant workers. Based on an equilibrium model, the authors show that the increase in four-day workweeks results more from workers’ preferences and/or their daily fixed costs of working than production costs. The wage penalty for a four-day workweek is greater when such work is more prevalent, and the penalty has diminished over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel S. Hamermesh & Jeff E. Biddle, 2025. "Days of Work over a Half Century: The Rise of the Four-Day Workweek," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 78(1), pages 37-61, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:78:y:2025:i:1:p:37-61
    DOI: 10.1177/00197939231209965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00197939231209965
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00197939231209965?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:78:y:2025:i:1:p:37-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.