IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v75y2022i5p1133-1158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Persistent Unpredictability: Analyzing Experiences with the First Statewide Scheduling Legislation in Oregon

Author

Listed:
  • Larissa Petrucci
  • Lola Loustaunau
  • Ellen Scott
  • Lina Stepick

Abstract

Based on 98 in-depth interviews with workers and managers, the authors analyze the effectiveness of Oregon’s Fair Workweek Act, the first statewide scheduling legislation. Overall, findings show limited evidence of the law’s efficacy to improve workers’ schedules. The authors discuss three factors that are likely to explain this shortcoming: lack of adequate funding for education about the law and for enforcement, the inclusion of provisions that undermine the intent of fair scheduling legislation, and the ability of employers to interpret the law with substantial leeway. In this context, the authors consider the persistence of unpredictable scheduling practices a form of “flexible discipline,†even under Fair Workweek legislation. This article contributes to the literature on unpredictable scheduling by showing that in order to address this problem, legislation must include robust funding for education, implementation, and enforcement and must avoid options for workers to waive their rights to predictability pay, which as part of the act is intended to compensate employees for last-minute schedule changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Larissa Petrucci & Lola Loustaunau & Ellen Scott & Lina Stepick, 2022. "Persistent Unpredictability: Analyzing Experiences with the First Statewide Scheduling Legislation in Oregon," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 75(5), pages 1133-1158, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:75:y:2022:i:5:p:1133-1158
    DOI: 10.1177/00197939211064902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00197939211064902
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00197939211064902?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:75:y:2022:i:5:p:1133-1158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.