IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v75y2022i1p3-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dependency Structure of Bad Jobs: How Market Constraint Undermines Job Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Richard A. Benton
  • Ki-Jung Kim

Abstract

Power and dependence in economic exchange shape industry structure. When a focal industry faces powerful suppliers or buyers, this can reduce industry rents. The authors argue that these dynamics also affect job quality by reducing the economic surplus available to be shared with workers. Drawing on ideas from power-dependency theory, this article explains industry earnings and job quality differences by examining inter-industry exchange patterns. The authors build on Ronald Burt’s seminal analysis of structural constraint in economic exchange using industry input-output tables. They calculate market constraint measures for recent years in the United States and link these with CPS data on wages and benefits. Analyses reveal that workers in more buyer-constrained industries (dependence on powerful buyers) experience lower wages and benefits. Findings also show that market constraint reduces the economic surplus available for union bargaining. Theory and results suggest that market concentration reduces suppliers’ economic rents, harming job quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard A. Benton & Ki-Jung Kim, 2022. "The Dependency Structure of Bad Jobs: How Market Constraint Undermines Job Quality," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 75(1), pages 3-27, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:75:y:2022:i:1:p:3-27
    DOI: 10.1177/0019793920936250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0019793920936250
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0019793920936250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:75:y:2022:i:1:p:3-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.