IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v69y2016i4p860-889.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Consequences of Electronic Health Record Adoption for Physician Productivity and Birth Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Chad D. Meyerhoefer
  • Mary E. Deily
  • Susan A. Sherer
  • Shin-Yi Chou
  • Lizhong Peng
  • Michael Sheinberg
  • Donald Levick

Abstract

The authors use a mixed-methods approach to investigate how the integration of electronic health records between ambulatory and hospital practices affected physician productivity and birth outcomes at a large health network. Physicians and staff were interviewed during a five-year staged integration of electronic health records, and a direct measure of physician productivity, relative value units, was analyzed concurrently with several measures of birth outcomes. The regression analyses show an 11% reduction in total productivity following the installation of the new system at primary-care sites. The qualitative findings indicate the reduction is attributable to the additional time physicians and staff needed to learn new processes, adopt work practice changes, and develop coordination. Nevertheless, users value the additional integration, especially as information flows back to the ambulatory practices from the hospital. This is supported by increases in treatment intensity over time and a 37% reduction in the severity of adverse birth events.

Suggested Citation

  • Chad D. Meyerhoefer & Mary E. Deily & Susan A. Sherer & Shin-Yi Chou & Lizhong Peng & Michael Sheinberg & Donald Levick, 2016. "The Consequences of Electronic Health Record Adoption for Physician Productivity and Birth Outcomes," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 69(4), pages 860-889, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:69:y:2016:i:4:p:860-889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ilr.sagepub.com/content/69/4/860.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seth Freedman & Noah Hammarlund, 2019. "Electronic medical records and medical procedure choice: Evidence from cesarean sections," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(10), pages 1179-1193, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:69:y:2016:i:4:p:860-889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.