Erratum

Susan J. T. Johnson has discovered an error in the abstract of her July 2010 article, “First Contract Arbitration: Effects on Work Stoppages.†The corrected abstract appears here (modifiedwordsareinboldtype) and the entire corrected article is available at http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/ilrreview/ . Newly certified unions often experience difficulty negotiating a first agreement. To remedy this, the Employee Free Choice Act proposes that the National Labor Relations Act provide for first contract arbitration (FCA). Using a panel of Canadian jurisdictions that have introduced FCA legislation at different times over several decades, the author addresses three questions: (1) How does this legislation affect the incidence of first agreement work stoppages? (2) Does FCA encourage or discourage collective bargaining in the negotiation of first agreements? (3) Does FCA influence the duration of first agreement work stoppages? First, the author finds that the presence of FCA legislation reduces first agreement work stoppage incidence by at least 50 percent. Descriptive measures reveal that FCA is accessed infrequently; it is even rarer for a first contract (in whole or in part) to be imposed. Second, the fact that FCA is associated with a substantial reduction in work stoppage incidence, when combined with evidence that it is rarely used, suggests that FCA encourages collective bargaining. Finally, FCA has no statistically significant impact on the duration of first agreement work stoppages. Editor