IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v63y2009i1p60-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Joint Responsibility Unionism: A Multi-Plant Model of Collective Bargaining under Employment Security

Author

Listed:
  • Richard N. Block
  • Peter Berg

Abstract

The authors develop a general model of local-level bargaining in the multi-plant firm. According to this model, when the parent firm has the ability to allocate production differentially across plants, the local union may be motivated to work with local management to reduce production costs and increase profitability, in order to increase plant employment or minimize reductions in plant employment. A case study using data from General Motors' Lansing Grand River Assembly (LGRA) and United Auto Workers Local 652, collected in part from interviews conducted in 2003–2008, shows how the parties established a joint responsibility system of collective bargaining that encouraged the union to reduce production costs and increase profitability by accepting responsibilities traditionally borne by management. The authors also demonstrate that General Motors, consistent with budget, capacity, and political constraints, invested in LGRA and assigned new product to LGRA, thus supporting the hypothesized incentive structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard N. Block & Peter Berg, 2009. "Joint Responsibility Unionism: A Multi-Plant Model of Collective Bargaining under Employment Security," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 63(1), pages 60-81, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:63:y:2009:i:1:p:60-81
    DOI: 10.1177/001979390906300104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001979390906300104
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/001979390906300104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:63:y:2009:i:1:p:60-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.