IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v42y1989i4p649-662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Historical Limits on Neoclassical Strike Theories: Evidence from French Coal Mining, 1890–1935

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Cohn
  • Adrienne Eaton

Abstract

This study analyzes the determinants of strikes in French coal mining over the period 1890–1935. The results indicate that factors emphasized by traditional bargaining power models were more important determinants of strikes in that setting than was economic variability. This finding supports the hypothesis that neoclassical theories of strikes—Hicksian theories that strikes are a function of the parties' lack of information about the economic environment in which bargaining takes place—are inappropriate in some historical and political contexts. Specifically, the authors argue that the many settings where (as in the case considered) strikes are politically motivated, firms have simple economic structures, and collective bargaining is poorly institutionalized should provide evidence discontinuing neoclassical predictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Cohn & Adrienne Eaton, 1989. "Historical Limits on Neoclassical Strike Theories: Evidence from French Coal Mining, 1890–1935," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 42(4), pages 649-662, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:42:y:1989:i:4:p:649-662
    DOI: 10.1177/001979398904200413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001979398904200413
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/001979398904200413?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:42:y:1989:i:4:p:649-662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.