IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v40y1986i1p35-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Greasing the Squeaky Wheel: The Relative Productivity of Osha Complaint Inspections

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Stewart Smith

Abstract

This paper questions the validity of allegations by the General Accounting Office in 1979 that OSHA was then allocating more of its resources to investigating worker complaints than the quality of those complaints warranted. Specifically, the author finds that complaint-initiated inspections and “general schedule†inspections (those made on the basis of targeting criteria developed by OSHA) were similarly productive in uncovering safety violations in 1977–79. The findings also suggest that the interindustry distribution of complaints closely matched the distribution of general schedule inspections; complaints were not used by unionized workers as a weapon in negotiations; and the 1980 changes in complaint handling that were enacted in response to the GAO's report did not improve the “yield†of complaint-initiated inspections relative to that of general schedule inspections.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Stewart Smith, 1986. "Greasing the Squeaky Wheel: The Relative Productivity of Osha Complaint Inspections," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 40(1), pages 35-47, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:40:y:1986:i:1:p:35-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ilr.sagepub.com/content/40/1/35.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ling Li & Shawn Rohlin & Perry Singleton, 2017. "Labor Unions and Occupational Safety: Event-Study Analysis Using Union Elections," Center for Policy Research Working Papers 205, Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School, Syracuse University.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:40:y:1986:i:1:p:35-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.