IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v35y1982i4p539-549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political Bias in NLRB Unfair Labor Practice Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • William N. Cooke
  • Frederick H. Gautschi III

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that U.S. presidents appoint members to the National Labor Relations Board who reflect the administration's own union-management predilections. No adequate empirical evidence has yet been reported, however, to show that, once appointed, Board members act in a biased manner. The present study develops and tests a choice model of Board member decisions in selected unfair labor practice cases over the 1954–77 period. The evidence strongly supports the popular belief that Board decisions are heavily dependent upon shifting political winds.

Suggested Citation

  • William N. Cooke & Frederick H. Gautschi III, 1982. "Political Bias in NLRB Unfair Labor Practice Decisions," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 35(4), pages 539-549, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:35:y:1982:i:4:p:539-549
    DOI: 10.1177/001979398203500406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001979398203500406
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/001979398203500406?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:35:y:1982:i:4:p:539-549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.