IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v25y2024i2_supplps184-s198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Electronic Word of Mouth on Customers’ Buying Intention Considering Trust as a Mediator: A SEM Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Shahed Mahmud
  • Md. Nazmul Islam
  • Md. Rostam Ali
  • Nadia Mehjabin

Abstract

For customers’ purchasing decisions, word of mouth (WOM) has been considered as one of the major influential factors. With the rise of Internet-based technology and usage of online-based devices, customers are now considering online reviews and other users’ e-opinions as one of the significant sources of information gathering for taking final purchasing decisions. Organizations also emphasize electronic word of mouth (eWOM) as a major promotional tool for their business. This study aims to examine the impact of eWOM on customers’ buying intention and tries to determine the mediating relationship of trust between eWOM and customers’ buying intention. For this, an exploratory study has been designed using the purposive and convenience sampling technique. With the assistance of a self-administrated structured questionnaire, a total of 218 respondents’ data were finally selected for the structural equation model (SEM) analysis. The result of the study reveals that eWOM has a direct influence on customers’ intention to buy without the presence of the mediator trust. Nevertheless, with the presence of trust as a mediator, the direct relationship gets weakened, resulting in full mediation. The study results can contribute both theoretically and practically in many ways.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. Shahed Mahmud & Md. Nazmul Islam & Md. Rostam Ali & Nadia Mehjabin, 2024. "Impact of Electronic Word of Mouth on Customers’ Buying Intention Considering Trust as a Mediator: A SEM Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(2_suppl), pages 184-198, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:25:y:2024:i:2_suppl:p:s184-s198
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150920976345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150920976345
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150920976345?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gruen, Thomas W. & Osmonbekov, Talai & Czaplewski, Andrew J., 2006. "eWOM: The impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 449-456, April.
    2. Eun Ju Seo & Jin-Woo Park & Yu Jin Choi, 2020. "The Effect of Social Media Usage Characteristics on e-WOM, Trust, and Brand Equity: Focusing on Users of Airline Social Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Bambauer-Sachse, Silke & Mangold, Sabrina, 2011. "Brand equity dilution through negative online word-of-mouth communication," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 38-45.
    4. Gobinda Roy & Biplab Datta & Rituparna Basu, 2017. "Effect of eWOM Valence on Online Retail Sales," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(1), pages 198-209, February.
    5. Abubakar Mohammed Abubakar, 2016. "Does eWOM influence destination trust and travel intention: a medical tourism perspective," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 598-611, January.
    6. Ayeh, Julian K. & Au, Norman & Law, Rob, 2013. "Predicting the intention to use consumer-generated media for travel planning," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 132-143.
    7. Ana Babić Rosario & Kristine Valck & Francesca Sotgiu, 2020. "Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 422-448, May.
    8. Coulson, Andrea B. & MacLaren, Andrew C. & McKenzie, Stewart & O'Gorman, Kevin D., 2014. "Hospitality codes and Social Exchange Theory: The Pashtunwali and tourism in Afghanistan," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 134-141.
    9. Kim, Myung-Ja & Chung, Namho & Lee, Choong-Ki, 2011. "The effect of perceived trust on electronic commerce: Shopping online for tourism products and services in South Korea," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 256-265.
    10. Sparks, Beverley A. & Browning, Victoria, 2011. "The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trust," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1310-1323.
    11. Lamb, Yasmin & Cai, Wenjie & McKenna, Brad, 2020. "Exploring the complexity of the individualistic culture through social exchange in online reviews," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    12. Bidyanand Jha, 2019. "The Role of Social Media Communication: Empirical Study of Online Purchase Intention of Financial Products," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(6), pages 1445-1461, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akbari, Morteza & Foroudi, Pantea & Zaman Fashami, Rahime & Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Khodayari, Maryam, 2022. "Let us talk about something: The evolution of e-WOM from the past to the future," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 663-689.
    2. Sharma, Mahak & Antony, Rose & Sehrawat, Rajat & Cruz, Angel Contreras & Daim, Tugrul U., 2022. "Exploring post-adoption behaviors of e-service users: Evidence from the hospitality sector /online travel services," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Young Joon Park & Jaewoo Joo & Charin Polpanumas & Yeujun Yoon, 2021. "“Worse Than What I Read?” The External Effect of Review Ratings on the Online Review Generation Process: An Empirical Analysis of Multiple Product Categories Using Amazon.com Review Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Colmekcioglu, Nazan & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea & Okumus, Fevzi, 2022. "Generation, susceptibility, and response regarding negativity: An in-depth analysis on negative online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 235-250.
    5. Brzozowska-Woś Magdalena & Schivinski Bruno, 2019. "The Effect of Online Reviews on Consumer-Based Brand Equity: Case-Study of the Polish Restaurant Sector," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 27(3), pages 2-27, September.
    6. Wu, Laurie & Shen, Han & Fan, Alei & Mattila, Anna S., 2017. "The impact of language style on consumers′ reactions to online reviews," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 590-596.
    7. Amaro, Suzanne & Duarte, Paulo & Henriques, Carla, 2016. "Travelers’ use of social media: A clustering approach," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-15.
    8. José Alberto Martínez-González & Eduardo Parra-López & Almudena Barrientos-Báez, 2021. "Young Consumers’ Intention to Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Ert, Eyal & Fleischer, Aliza & Magen, Nathan, 2016. "Trust and reputation in the sharing economy: The role of personal photos in Airbnb," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 62-73.
    10. Agnieszka Zablocki & Bodo Schlegelmilch & Michael J. Houston, 2019. "How valence, volume and variance of online reviews influence brand attitudes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 61-77, June.
    11. Rishikesh Bhaiswar & N. Meenakshi & Deepak Chawla, 2021. "Evolution of Electronic Word of Mouth: A Systematic Literature Review Using Bibliometric Analysis of 20 Years (2000–2020)," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 10(3), pages 215-231, September.
    12. Liu, Zhiwei & Park, Sangwon, 2015. "What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 140-151.
    13. Wonho Song & Sangkon Park & Doojin Ryu, 2017. "Information Quality of Online Reviews in the Presence of Potentially Fake Reviews," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 33, pages 5-34.
    14. Suzanne Amaro & Paulo Duarte, 2017. "Social media use for travel purposes: a cross cultural comparison between Portugal and the UK," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 161-181, June.
    15. Slak Valek, Nataša, 2015. "Tourism expenditure according to mode of transportation: A comparative study between 2009 and 2012," MPRA Paper 77406, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 07 Oct 2015.
    16. Azer, Jaylan & Ranaweera, Chatura, 2022. "Former customers’ E-WOM in social media platforms: An investigation of motives, network size and social ties," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 118-133.
    17. Eslami, Seyed Pouyan & Ghasemaghaei, Maryam, 2018. "Effects of online review positiveness and review score inconsistency on sales: A comparison by product involvement," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 74-80.
    18. Plotkina, Daria & Munzel, Andreas, 2016. "Delight the experts, but never dissatisfy your customers! A multi-category study on the effects of online review source on intention to buy a new product," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 1-11.
    19. Arijit Bhattacharya & Manjari Srivastava, 2020. "A Framework of Online Customer Experience: An Indian Perspective," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(3), pages 800-817, June.
    20. Ravula, Prashanth & Bhatnagar, Amit & Gauri, Dinesh K, 2023. "Role of gender in the creation and persuasiveness of online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:25:y:2024:i:2_suppl:p:s184-s198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.