IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v14y2013i3p385-395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market Orientation and Entrepreneurial Proclivity: Antecedents of Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen Otero-Neira

    (Carmen Otero-Neira, Ph.D., is Professor of marketing in the Economics and Business School at the University of Vigo. E-mail: cachu@uvigo.es)

  • Mª Jesús Fernández Arias

    (Mª Jesús Fernández Arias is Senior Lecturer and Researcher at the Faculty of Economics and Business. E-mail: jarias@uvigo.es)

  • Martti Tapio Lindman

    (Martti Tapio Lindman is the Professor of Concept Management at the University of Vaasa, Finland. E-mail: martti.lindman@uwasa.fi)

Abstract

Purpose: Innovation has been traditionally considered as a generator of competitiveness. Despite the increasing importance of innovation in the literature, there is no agreement about its antecedents. This clearly makes difficult and risky for the managers to choose suitable strategies to promote and develop successful innovations. The present research attempts to contribute to this important area by providing some critical insights on the origins of the innovative behaviour of the firms; namely: market orientation and entrepreneurial proclivity. Design/methodology/approach: To reach our goal we used in-depth case research methodology in furniture firms from Italy, Spain and Finland. Findings: The article contributes to the understanding of why some firms are more innovative than others. The study shows some evidence that market orientation and the entrepreneurship can be considered as antecedents of innovation. Research limitations/implications: We provide evidence that the furniture industry shows a tendency to innovate based on its market orientation along with its entrepreneurial proclivity probably due to the fact that it is a traditional, non-globalized low-tech sector. Future studies might also address other variables related to different competitive settings. Practical implications: This work presents direct implications for companies aiming at improving their innovation capabilities. First, it is recommended that entrepreneurial firms should promote a market orientation philosophy, and second, they also need the top management commitment in terms of people and financial resources to achieve its goals. Originality/value: This article offers an insight to explain why some companies are more successful at starting and developing innovation than others. The finding that a successful innovation profile is related to entrepreneurship and the market orientation of the company represents an interesting contribution to the management of firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen Otero-Neira & Mª Jesús Fernández Arias & Martti Tapio Lindman, 2013. "Market Orientation and Entrepreneurial Proclivity: Antecedents of Innovation," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 14(3), pages 385-395, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:14:y:2013:i:3:p:385-395
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150913496719
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150913496719
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150913496719?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sascha Kraus & Ilkka Kauranen & Carl Henning Reschke, 2011. "Identification of domains for a new conceptual model of strategic entrepreneurship using the configuration approach," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(1), pages 58-74, January.
    2. John L Naman & Dennis P. Slevin, 1993. "Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 137-153, February.
    3. A. Fayolle & O. Basso & V. Bouchard, 2010. "Three Levels of Culture and Firms' Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Research Agenda," Post-Print halshs-00553097, HAL.
    4. Secondo Rolfo & Giuseppe Calabrese, 2003. "Traditional SMEs and innovation: the role of the industrial policy in Italy," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 253-271, July.
    5. Jeffrey G. Covin & Dennis P. Slevin, 1991. "A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 16(1), pages 7-26, October.
    6. Oswald Jones & Allan Macpherson & Richard Thorpe, 2010. "Learning in owner-managed small firms: Mediating artefacts and strategic space," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(7-8), pages 649-673, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Agbeko & Vincent Blok & Swf Omta & G Van Der Velde, 2016. "Entrepreneurial And Business Skills And Loan Repayment Rates Of Microfinance Clients In Ghana," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(04), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Mirkó Gáti & András Bauer, 2019. "Marketing Decision-Making in Hungarian SMEs," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 31(1), pages 39-59.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Strese, Steffen & Adams, Daniel R. & Flatten, Tessa C. & Brettel, Malte, 2016. "Corporate culture and absorptive capacity: The moderating role of national culture dimensions on innovation management," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 1149-1168.
    2. Christopher Arz, 2017. "Mechanisms of Organizational Culture for Fostering Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 25(04), pages 361-409, December.
    3. Yan Ling & María Concepción López-Fernández & Ana María Serrano-Bedia & Franz W. Kellermanns, 2020. "Organizational culture and entrepreneurial orientation: examination through a new conceptualization lens," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 709-737, June.
    4. Jelica Rastoka & Saša Petković & Dragana Radicic, 2022. "Impact of Entrepreneurship on the Quality of Public Health Sector Institutions and Policies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Bojan Morić Milovanović & Mirjana Grčić Fabić & Vjekoslav Bratić, 2023. "Strategic Approach to Configurational Analysis of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Strategic Networking, and SME Performance within Emerging Markets of Selected Southeast European Countries," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Johan Wiklund, 1999. "The Sustainability of the Entrepreneurial Orientation—Performance Relationship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 24(1), pages 37-48, October.
    7. Shih-Kai Lin & Hung-Chang Chung, 2023. "The Relationship Between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance From the perspective of MASEM: The Mediation Effect of Market Orientation and the Moderated Mediation Effect of Environmental ," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    8. Salunke, Sandeep & Weerawardena, Jay & McColl-Kennedy, Janet R., 2013. "Competing through service innovation: The role of bricolage and entrepreneurship in project-oriented firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1085-1097.
    9. Christopher Schlaegel & Robert L. Engle & Nicole Franziska Richter & Pia Christin Taureck, 2021. "Personal factors, entrepreneurial intention, and entrepreneurial status: A multinational study in three institutional environments," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 357-398, September.
    10. Amir Forouharfar & Seyed Aligholi Rowshan & Habibollah Salarzehi, 2018. "An epistemological critique of social entrepreneurship definitions," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 8(1), pages 1-40, December.
    11. Abubakar S. Garba & Ibrahim Kabir & Mahmoud A. Mahmoud, 2019. "Entrepreneurial Orientation And Growth Potential Of Microenterprises In Northwest, Nigeria," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Tarja Niemelä & Reija Häkkinen, 2014. "The Role of Pluriactivity for Continuity and Survival in Family Farm Firms," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 10(4), pages 7-43.
    13. Dimitratos, Pavlos & Lioukas, Spyros & Carter, Sara, 2004. "The relationship between entrepreneurship and international performance: the importance of domestic environment," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 19-41, February.
    14. Wiklund, Johan & Shepherd, Dean, 2005. "Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 71-91, January.
    15. Isabel Pizarro-Moreno & Juan C. Real & Elena Sousa-Ginel, 2007. "Corporate Entrepreneurship: Building a Knowledge-Based View of the Firm," Working Papers 07.02, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Business Administration.
    16. Walter, Achim & Auer, Michael & Ritter, Thomas, 2006. "The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 541-567, July.
    17. Ayşegül Eryılmaz Kıralı & Songül Zehir & Reha özder, 2024. "Competitive Strategies and Market Performance: The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurship Orientation in COVID-19 Period," Journal of Ibn Haldun Studies [İbn Haldun Çalışmaları Dergisi], Ibn Haldun University, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, January.
    18. Ana M. Moreno & José C. Casillas, 2008. "Entrepreneurial Orientation and Growth of SMEs: A Causal Model," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(3), pages 507-528, May.
    19. Patrick M. Kreiser & Louis D. Marino & K. Mark Weaver, 2002. "Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Entrepreneurial Orientation Scale: A Multi-Country Analysis," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 26(4), pages 71-93, July.
    20. Johan Wiklund & Holger Patzelt & Dean Shepherd, 2009. "Building an integrative model of small business growth," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 351-374, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:14:y:2013:i:3:p:385-395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.