IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v6y1982i1p5-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Housing Benefits From the Section 8 Housing Program

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel H. Weinberg

    (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services)

Abstract

The Section 8 housing program is the largest U. S. housing assistance program. This article presents the first systematic analysis of the benefits participating households receive and compares those benefits with federal government costs. Section 8 New Construction projects provide acceptable housing at an affordable price to those low-income households fortunate enough to be accepted by the developers. However, about 20% of the total project rents goes to program-related costs rather than to tenant benefits. A major advantage of the Section 8 Existing Housingprogram is that tenant benefits are provided without excessive rent increases. But, most units in that program do not meet Section 8 Acceptability Criteria. A shift in emphasis from the New Construction to the Existing Housing program can save the government significant amounts of money yet maintain the number of households assisted.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel H. Weinberg, 1982. "Housing Benefits From the Section 8 Housing Program," Evaluation Review, , vol. 6(1), pages 5-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:6:y:1982:i:1:p:5-24
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8200600102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8200600102
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X8200600102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weinberg, Daniel H. & Friedman, Joseph & Mayo, Stephen K., 1981. "Intraurban residential mobility: The role of transactions costs, market imperfections, and household disequilibrium," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 332-348, May.
    2. Thurow, Lester C, 1974. "Cash Versus In-Kind Transfers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(2), pages 190-195, May.
    3. Polinsky, A Mitchell, 1977. "The Demand for Housing: A Study in Specification and Grouping," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 45(2), pages 447-461, March.
    4. Friedman, Joseph & Weinberg, Daniel H., 1981. "The demand for rental housing: Evidence from the Housing Allowance Demand Experiment," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 311-331, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edgar O. Olsen, 2003. "Housing Programs for Low-Income Households," NBER Chapters, in: Means-Tested Transfer Programs in the United States, pages 365-442, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Edgar O. Olsen & Dirk W. Early & Paul E. Carrillo, 2010. "A Panel of Price Indices for Housing, Other Goods, and All Goods for All Areas in the United States 1982-2008," Virginia Economics Online Papers 377, University of Virginia, Department of Economics.
    3. Edgar O. Olsen & Dirk W. Early & Paul E. Carrillo, 2012. "This paper documents the production of a panel of price indices for housing services, other produced goods, and all produced goods for each metropolitan area in the United States and the non-metropoli," Virginia Economics Online Papers 402, University of Virginia, Department of Economics.
    4. McMillen, Daniel & Singh, Ruchi, 2020. "Fair market rent and the distribution of rents in Los Angeles," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    5. Edgar O. Olsen & Jeffrey M. Tebbs, 2011. "The Effect on Program Participation of Replacing Current Low-Income Housing Programs with an Entitlement Housing Voucher Program," Virginia Economics Online Papers 378, University of Virginia, Department of Economics.
    6. Edgar O. Olsen, 2000. "The Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Methods of Delivering Housing Subsidies," Virginia Economics Online Papers 351, University of Virginia, Department of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Venti, Steven F. & Wise, David A., 1984. "Moving and housing expenditure: Transaction costs and disequilibrium," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1-2), pages 207-243.
    2. Quigley, John M., 2002. "Transactions Costs and Housing Markets," Berkeley Program on Housing and Urban Policy, Working Paper Series qt6pz8p6zt, Berkeley Program on Housing and Urban Policy.
    3. A G Phipps & W J Holden, 1985. "Intended-Mobility Responses to Inner-City School Closure," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 17(9), pages 1169-1183, September.
    4. Haurin, Donald R. & Gill, H. Leroy, 2002. "The Impact of Transaction Costs and the Expected Length of Stay on Homeownership," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 563-584, May.
    5. Ferda Halicioglu, 2007. "The demand for new housing in Turkey: an application of ARDL model," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 62-74.
    6. Temple, Judy A., 1998. "Recent Clinton Urban Education Initiatives and the Role of School Quality in Metropolitan Finance," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 51(n. 3), pages 517-29, September.
    7. A G Phipps, 1987. "Households' Utilities and Hedonic Prices for Inner-City Homes," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 19(1), pages 59-80, January.
    8. Edward A. Baryla & Leonard V. Zumpano, 1995. "Buyer Search Duration in the Residential Real Estate Market: The Role of the Real Estate Agent," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14.
    9. Mark Dynarski, 1986. "Residential Attachment and Housing Demand," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 23(1), pages 11-20, February.
    10. Mittelhammer, Ron & West, Donald A., 1975. "Food Stamp Participation Among Low-Income Households: Theoretical Considerations of the Impact on the Demand for Food," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 223-231, July.
    11. Mervyn A. King, 1983. "The Distribution of Gains and Losses from Changes in the Tax Treatment of Housing," NBER Chapters, in: Behavioral Simulation Methods in Tax Policy Analysis, pages 109-138, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Bruno Frey & Alois Stutzer, 2014. "Economic Consequences of Mispredicting Utility," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 937-956, August.
    13. Anna Damm & Michael Rosholm, 2010. "Employment effects of spatial dispersal of refugees," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 105-146, March.
    14. Teresa Casey & Christian Dustmann, 2008. "Intergenerational Transmission of Language Capital and Economic Outcomes," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 43(3), pages 4660-4687.
    15. B.G. Dahlby, 1982. "Traditional View of the Incidence of the Property Tax: an Examination," Public Finance Review, , vol. 10(3), pages 369-383, July.
    16. John M. Quigley, 2001. "Monetary Policy and Homeowner Mobility: The Effect of Mortgage interest Rates," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(1), pages 1-10.
    17. Renato Aguilar & Bo Sandelin, 1988. "Qualitative Response Estimations of the Selling Behaviour in the Swedish Market for Owner-Occupied Houses," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 25(1), pages 77-84, February.
    18. Kasy, Maximilian, 2015. "Identification in a model of sorting with social externalities and the causes of urban segregation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 16-33.
    19. Victor R. Fuchs, 2005. "Health, Government, and Irving Fisher," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 407-425, January.
    20. Mette Deding & Trine Filges & Jos Van Ommeren, 2009. "Spatial Mobility And Commuting: The Case Of Two‐Earner Households," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 113-147, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:6:y:1982:i:1:p:5-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.