IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v40y2016i4p334-377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meaningful Effect Sizes, Intraclass Correlations, and Proportions of Variance Explained by Covariates for Planning Two- and Three-Level Cluster Randomized Trials of Social and Behavioral Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Nianbo Dong
  • Wendy M. Reinke
  • Keith C. Herman
  • Catherine P. Bradshaw
  • Desiree W. Murray

Abstract

Background: There is a need for greater guidance regarding design parameters and empirical benchmarks for social and behavioral outcomes to inform assumptions in the design and interpretation of cluster randomized trials (CRTs). Objectives: We calculated the empirical reference values on critical research design parameters associated with statistical power for children’s social and behavioral outcomes, including effect sizes, intraclass correlations (ICCs), and proportions of variance explained by a covariate at different levels ( R 2 ). Subjects: Children from kindergarten to Grade 5 in the samples from four large CRTs evaluating the effectiveness of two classroom- and two school-level preventive interventions. Measures: Teacher ratings of students’ social and behavioral outcomes using the Teacher Observation of Classroom Adaptation–Checklist and the Social Competence Scale–Teacher. Research design: Two types of effect size benchmarks were calculated: (1) normative expectations for change and (2) policy-relevant demographic performance gaps. The ICCs and R 2 were calculated using two-level hierarchical linear modeling (HLM), where students are nested within schools, and three-level HLM, where students were nested within classrooms, and classrooms were nested within schools. Results and Conclusions: Comprehensive tables of benchmarks and ICC values are provided to inform prevention researchers in interpreting the effect size of interventions and conduct power analyses for designing CRTs of children’s social and behavioral outcomes. The discussion also provides a demonstration for how to use the parameter reference values provided in this article to calculate the sample size for two- and three-level CRTs designs.

Suggested Citation

  • Nianbo Dong & Wendy M. Reinke & Keith C. Herman & Catherine P. Bradshaw & Desiree W. Murray, 2016. "Meaningful Effect Sizes, Intraclass Correlations, and Proportions of Variance Explained by Covariates for Planning Two- and Three-Level Cluster Randomized Trials of Social and Behavioral Outcomes," Evaluation Review, , vol. 40(4), pages 334-377, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:40:y:2016:i:4:p:334-377
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X16671283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X16671283
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X16671283?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:mpr:mprres:5863 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Larry V. Hedges & E. C. Hedberg, 2013. "Intraclass Correlations and Covariate Outcome Correlations for Planning Two- and Three-Level Cluster-Randomized Experiments in Education," Evaluation Review, , vol. 37(6), pages 445-489, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ben Kelcey & Zuchao Shen & Jessaca Spybrook, 2016. "Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Designing Cluster-Randomized Trials in Sub-Saharan Africa Education," Evaluation Review, , vol. 40(6), pages 500-525, December.
    2. Daniel McNeish & Jeffrey R. Harring & Denis Dumas, 2023. "A multilevel structured latent curve model for disaggregating student and school contributions to learning," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(2), pages 545-575, June.
    3. E. C. Hedberg, 2016. "Academic and Behavioral Design Parameters for Cluster Randomized Trials in Kindergarten," Evaluation Review, , vol. 40(4), pages 279-313, August.
    4. Elizabeth Tipton & Robert B. Olsen, "undated". "Enhancing the Generalizability of Impact Studies in Education," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 35d5625333dc480aba9765b3b, Mathematica Policy Research.
    5. Jessaca Spybrook & Benjamin Kelcey, 2016. "Introduction to Three Special Issues on Design Parameter Values for Planning Cluster Randomized Trials in the Social Sciences," Evaluation Review, , vol. 40(6), pages 491-499, December.
    6. Larry V. Hedges & Michael Borenstein, 2014. "Conditional Optimal Design in Three- and Four-Level Experiments," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 39(4), pages 257-281, August.
    7. Blair S Grace & Tess Gregory & Luke Collier & Sally Brinkman, 2022. "Clustering of Wellbeing, Engagement and Academic Outcomes in Australian Primary Schools," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(6), pages 2171-2195, December.
    8. Nianbo Dong & Benjamin Kelcey & Jessaca Spybrook, 2021. "Design Considerations in Multisite Randomized Trials Probing Moderated Treatment Effects," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(5), pages 527-559, October.
    9. E. C. Hedberg & Larry V. Hedges, 2014. "Reference Values of Within-District Intraclass Correlations of Academic Achievement by District Characteristics," Evaluation Review, , vol. 38(6), pages 546-582, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:40:y:2016:i:4:p:334-377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.