IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v40y2016i2p142-161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design Effectiveness Analysis of a Media Literacy Intervention to Reduce Violent Video Games Consumption Among Adolescents

Author

Listed:
  • Reynaldo Rivera
  • David Santos
  • Gaspar Brändle
  • Miguel à ngel M. Cárdaba

Abstract

Background Exposure to media violence might have detrimental effects on psychological adjustment and is associated with aggression-related attitudes and behaviors. As a result, many media literacy programs were implemented to tackle that major public health issue. However, there is little evidence about their effectiveness. Evaluating design effectiveness, particularly regarding targeting process, would prevent adverse effects and improve the evaluation of evidence-based media literacy programs. Objectives The present research examined whether or not different relational lifestyles may explain the different effects of an antiviolence intervention program. Research design Based on relational and lifestyles theory, the authors designed a randomized controlled trial and applied an analysis of variance 2 (treatment: experimental vs. control) × 4 (lifestyle classes emerged from data using latent class analysis: communicative vs. autonomous vs. meta-reflexive vs. fractured). Subjects Seven hundred and thirty-five Italian students distributed in 47 classes participated anonymously in the research (51.3% females). Measures Participants completed a lifestyle questionnaire as well as their attitudes and behavioral intentions as the dependent measures. Results The results indicated that the program was effective in changing adolescents’ attitudes toward violence. However, behavioral intentions toward consumption of violent video games were moderated by lifestyles. Those with communicative relational lifestyles showed fewer intentions to consume violent video games, while a boomerang effect was found among participants with problematic lifestyles. Conclusion Adolescents’ lifestyles played an important role in influencing the effectiveness of an intervention aimed at changing behavioral intentions toward the consumption of violent video games. For that reason, audience lifestyle segmentation analysis should be considered an essential technique for designing, evaluating, and improving media literacy programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Reynaldo Rivera & David Santos & Gaspar Brändle & Miguel à ngel M. Cárdaba, 2016. "Design Effectiveness Analysis of a Media Literacy Intervention to Reduce Violent Video Games Consumption Among Adolescents," Evaluation Review, , vol. 40(2), pages 142-161, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:40:y:2016:i:2:p:142-161
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X16666196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X16666196
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X16666196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farrelly, M.C. & Pechacek, T.F. & Thomas, K.Y. & Nelson, D., 2008. "The impact of tobacco control programs on adult smoking," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(2), pages 304-309.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adel Bosch & Steven F. Koch, 2014. "Using a Natural Experiment to Examine Tobacco Tax Regressivity," Working Papers 201424, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    2. Christina Czart Ciecierski & Pinka Chatterji & Frank J. Chaloupka & Henry Wechsler, 2011. "Do state expenditures on tobacco control programs decrease use of tobacco products among college students?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(3), pages 253-272, March.
    3. Dana S Mowls & D Robert McCaffree & Laura A Beebe, 2015. "Trends in Lung Cancer Incidence Rates, Oklahoma 2005–2010," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-6, April.
    4. John A Tauras & Xin Xu & Jidong Huang & Brian King & S Rene Lavinghouze & Karla S Sneegas & Frank J Chaloupka, 2018. "State tobacco control expenditures and tax paid cigarette sales," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Andrea C Villanti & Yiding Jiang & David B Abrams & Bruce S Pyenson, 2013. "A Cost-Utility Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening and the Additional Benefits of Incorporating Smoking Cessation Interventions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-11, August.
    6. Andrew Fenelon & Samuel Preston, 2012. "Estimating Smoking-Attributable Mortality in the United States," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 49(3), pages 797-818, August.
    7. Rhoads, Jennifer K., 2012. "The effect of comprehensive state tobacco control programs on adult cigarette smoking," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 393-405.
    8. Lauren M. Dutra & Matthew C. Farrelly & James Nonnemaker & Brian Bradfield & Jennifer Gaber & Minal Patel & Elizabeth C. Hair, 2019. "Differential Relationship between Tobacco Control Policies and U.S. Adult Current Smoking by Poverty," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Mary Hrywna & Irina B. Grafova & Cristine D. Delnevo, 2019. "The Role of Marketing Practices and Tobacco Control Initiatives on Smokeless Tobacco Sales, 2005–2010," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Christopher Man-Kit Leung & Alexander K. C. Leung & Kam-Lun Ellis Hon & Albert Yim-Fai Kong, 2009. "Fighting Tobacco Smoking - a Difficult but Not Impossible Battle," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, January.
    11. Joachim Marti, 2014. "The Impact Of Tobacco Control Expenditures On Smoking Initiation And Cessation," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(12), pages 1397-1410, December.
    12. Okechukwu, Cassandra & Bacic, Janine & Cheng, Kai-Wen & Catalano, Ralph, 2012. "Smoking among construction workers: The nonlinear influence of the economy, cigarette prices, and antismoking sentiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(8), pages 1379-1386.
    13. Koch, Steven F., 2018. "Quasi-experimental evidence on tobacco tax regressivity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 19-28.
    14. Krishnan, R. & Pearce, J.M., 2018. "Economic impact of substituting solar photovoltaic electric production for tobacco farming," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 503-509.
    15. John A. Tauras & Megan C. Diaz & Barbara Schillo & Donna Vallone, 2020. "The Impact of State Tobacco Control Spending on High School Student Vaping," NBER Working Papers 27539, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Federico A.Todeschini & José María Labeaga & Sergi Jiménez Martín, 2010. "Killing by lung cancer or by diabetes? The trade-off between smoking and obesity," Working Papers 2010-16, FEDEA.
    17. Gallet Craig A, 2011. "Determinants of Tobacco Control Funding: Evidence from U.S. States," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, July.
    18. Matthew C Farrelly & James M Nonnemaker & Kimberly A Watson, 2012. "The Consequences of High Cigarette Excise Taxes for Low-Income Smokers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-7, September.
    19. Antwan Jones & Angelika Gulbis & Elizabeth Baker, 2010. "Differences in tobacco use between Canada and the United States," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 55(3), pages 167-175, June.
    20. Vardges Hovhannisyan & Vahé Heboyan & Magdana Kondaridze, 2024. "An empirical assessment of effectiveness of the US tobacco control policies: a smoothed instrumental variables quantile regression approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 465-493, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:40:y:2016:i:2:p:142-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.