IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i19p3650-d271773.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Marketing Practices and Tobacco Control Initiatives on Smokeless Tobacco Sales, 2005–2010

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Hrywna

    (Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, NJ 08091, USA
    Department of Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
    Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08091, USA)

  • Irina B. Grafova

    (Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, NJ 08091, USA
    Department of Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA)

  • Cristine D. Delnevo

    (Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, NJ 08091, USA
    Department of Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
    Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08091, USA)

Abstract

Background: Little is known about how policies and industry activities impact smokeless tobacco demand. We examined how tobacco control policies and retail promotion may affect smokeless tobacco sales. Methods: We used Nielsen market-level retail scanner data for smokeless tobacco sales in convenience stores in 30 US regions from 2005 to 2010. Tobacco policy variables, including excise taxes, state tobacco control program expenditures, and clean indoor air laws, were merged to Nielsen markets. We estimated regression models for per capita unit sales. Results: Higher cigarette tax was significantly associated with lower sales volume of smokeless tobacco. Sales of smokeless tobacco in markets with a weight-based SLT excise tax were higher than in markets with an ad valorem tax. A higher average product price was associated with decreased sales overall but results varied by package quantity and brand. Conclusions: This study observed that smokeless tobacco products were both complements and substitutes to cigarettes. Thus, smokeless tobacco may act as complements for some population segments and substitutes for others. A weight-based tax generally favors premium smokeless tobacco products.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Hrywna & Irina B. Grafova & Cristine D. Delnevo, 2019. "The Role of Marketing Practices and Tobacco Control Initiatives on Smokeless Tobacco Sales, 2005–2010," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:19:p:3650-:d:271773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/19/3650/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/19/3650/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dave, Dhaval & Saffer, Henry, 2013. "Demand for smokeless tobacco: Role of advertising," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 682-697.
    2. Christina Czart Ciecierski & Pinka Chatterji & Frank J. Chaloupka & Henry Wechsler, 2011. "Do state expenditures on tobacco control programs decrease use of tobacco products among college students?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(3), pages 253-272, March.
    3. Scott Adams & Chad D. Cotti & Daniel M. Fuhrmann, 2013. "Smokeless Tobacco Use Following Smoking Bans in Bars," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 80(1), pages 147-161, July.
    4. Frank J. Chaloupka & John A. Tauras & Michael Grossman, 1997. "Public Policy and Youth Smokeless Tobacco Use," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 503-516, October.
    5. Yuqing Zheng & Chen Zhen & Daniel Dench & James M. Nonnemaker, 2017. "U.S. Demand for Tobacco Products in a System Framework," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(8), pages 1067-1086, August.
    6. Robert L. Ohsfeldt & Raymond G. Boyle & Eli Capilouto, 1997. "Letter: Effects of tobacco excise taxes on the use of smokeless tobacco products in the USA," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 6(5), pages 525-531, September.
    7. Rajeev Goel & Michael Nelson, 2005. "Tobacco policy and tobacco use: differences across tobacco types, gender and age," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(7), pages 765-771.
    8. Farrelly, M.C. & Pechacek, T.F. & Thomas, K.Y. & Nelson, D., 2008. "The impact of tobacco control programs on adult smoking," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(2), pages 304-309.
    9. repec:wly:soecon:v:80:1:y:2013:p:147-161 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Farrelly, M.C. & Loomis, B.R. & Han, B. & Gfroerer, J. & Kuiper, N. & Couzens, G.L. & Dube, S. & Caraballo, R.S., 2013. "A comprehensive examination of the influence of state tobacco control programs and policies on youth smoking," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(3), pages 549-555.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cotti, Chad & Courtemanche, Charles & Maclean, Joanna Catherine & Nesson, Erik & Pesko, Michael F. & Tefft, Nathan W., 2022. "The effects of e-cigarette taxes on e-cigarette prices and tobacco product sales: Evidence from retail panel data," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    2. Christina Czart Ciecierski & Pinka Chatterji & Frank J. Chaloupka & Henry Wechsler, 2011. "Do state expenditures on tobacco control programs decrease use of tobacco products among college students?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(3), pages 253-272, March.
    3. Yuqing Zheng & Chen Zhen & Daniel Dench & James M. Nonnemaker, 2017. "U.S. Demand for Tobacco Products in a System Framework," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(8), pages 1067-1086, August.
    4. Kostova, Deliana & Dave, Dhaval, 2015. "Smokeless tobacco use in India: Role of prices and advertising," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 82-90.
    5. Hovhannisyan, Vardges & Bastian, Christopher T. & Devadoss, Stephen, 2020. "An Empirical Analysis of Tobacco Addiction," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304425, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Chad Cotti & Erik Nesson & Nathan Tefft, 2016. "The Effects of Tobacco Control Policies on Tobacco Products, Tar, and Nicotine Purchases among Adults: Evidence from Household Panel Data," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 8(4), pages 103-123, November.
    7. John A Tauras & Xin Xu & Jidong Huang & Brian King & S Rene Lavinghouze & Karla S Sneegas & Frank J Chaloupka, 2018. "State tobacco control expenditures and tax paid cigarette sales," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Rhoads, Jennifer K., 2012. "The effect of comprehensive state tobacco control programs on adult cigarette smoking," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 393-405.
    9. Dave, Dhaval & Dench, Daniel & Grossman, Michael & Kenkel, Donald S. & Saffer, Henry, 2019. "Does e-cigarette advertising encourage adult smokers to quit?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    10. Lauren M. Dutra & Matthew C. Farrelly & James Nonnemaker & Brian Bradfield & Jennifer Gaber & Minal Patel & Elizabeth C. Hair, 2019. "Differential Relationship between Tobacco Control Policies and U.S. Adult Current Smoking by Poverty," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Rajeev Goel, 2009. "Cigarette prices and illicit drug use: is there a connection?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1071-1076.
    12. Joachim Marti, 2014. "The Impact Of Tobacco Control Expenditures On Smoking Initiation And Cessation," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(12), pages 1397-1410, December.
    13. Henry Saffer & Daniel Dench & Michael Grossman & Dhaval Dave, 2020. "E-cigarettes and adult smoking: Evidence from Minnesota," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 207-228, June.
    14. Gallet Craig A, 2011. "Determinants of Tobacco Control Funding: Evidence from U.S. States," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, July.
    15. Vardges Hovhannisyan & Vahé Heboyan & Magdana Kondaridze, 2024. "An empirical assessment of effectiveness of the US tobacco control policies: a smoothed instrumental variables quantile regression approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 465-493, August.
    16. Robert L. Ohsfeldt & Raymond G. Boyle & Eli I. Capilouto, 1999. "Tobacco Taxes, Smoking Restrictions, and Tobacco Use," NBER Chapters, in: The Economic Analysis of Substance Use and Abuse: An Integration of Econometric and Behavioral Economic Research, pages 15-30, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Scott Adams & Chad D. Cotti & Daniel M. Fuhrmann, 2013. "Smokeless Tobacco Use Following Smoking Bans in Bars," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 80(1), pages 147-161, July.
    18. John Tauras & Lisa Powell & Frank Chaloupka & Hana Ross, 2007. "The demand for smokeless tobacco among male high school students in the United States: the impact of taxes, prices and policies," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 31-41.
    19. Rajeev K. Goel & Michael A. Nelson, 2006. "The Effectiveness of Anti‐Smoking Legislation: A Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 325-355, July.
    20. Asare, Samuel, 2024. "Association of cigarette smoking with changes in macroeconomic conditions," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:19:p:3650-:d:271773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.