IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v35y2011i2p153-188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Free to Grow: Head Start Partnerships to Promote Substance-Free Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Wolfson

    (Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA, mwolfson@wfubmc.edu)

  • Heather Champion

    (Research, Innovation and Product Development, Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC, USA)

  • Todd Rogers

    (RTI International, San Francisco, CA, USA)

  • Rebecca H. Neiberg

    (Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA)

  • Dianne C. Barker

    (Barker Bi-Coastal Health Consultants, Inc., Calabasas, CA, USA)

  • Jennifer W. Talton

    (Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA)

  • Edward H. Ip

    (Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA)

  • Ralph B. D'Agostino Jr

    (Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA)

  • Maria T. Parries

    (Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA)

  • Doug Easterling

    (Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA)

Abstract

Free to Grow: Head Start Partnerships to Promote Substance-free Communities (FTG) was a national initiative in which local Head Start (HS) agencies, in partnership with other community organizations, implemented a mix of evidence-based family-strengthening and community-strengthening strategies. The evaluation of FTG used a quasi-experimental design to compare 14 communities that participated in the FTG intervention with 14 matched comparison communities. Telephone surveys were conducted with two cohorts of the primary caregivers of children in HS at baseline and then annually for 2 years. The survey was also administered to repeated cross-sectional samples of primary caregivers of young children who were not enrolled in HS. No consistent evidence was found in changes in family functioning or neighborhood conditions when the 14 FTG sites were compared to 14 matched sites. However, caregivers of young children who were not in HS in three high-implementing FTG sites showed evidence of improvements in neighborhood organization, neighborhood norms against substance abuse, and child disciplinary practices. Results provide highly limited support for the concept that family and neighborhood conditions that are likely to affect child development and well-being can be changed through organized efforts implemented by local HS programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Wolfson & Heather Champion & Todd Rogers & Rebecca H. Neiberg & Dianne C. Barker & Jennifer W. Talton & Edward H. Ip & Ralph B. D'Agostino Jr & Maria T. Parries & Doug Easterling, 2011. "Evaluation of Free to Grow: Head Start Partnerships to Promote Substance-Free Communities," Evaluation Review, , vol. 35(2), pages 153-188, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:35:y:2011:i:2:p:153-188
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X11403989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X11403989
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X11403989?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Forster, J.L. & Murray, D.M. & Wolfson, M. & Blaine, T.M. & Wagenaar, A.C. & Hennrikus, D.J., 1998. "The effects of community policies to reduce youth access to tobacco," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(8), pages 1193-1198.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan L. Blitstein & Peter J. Hannan & David M. Murray & William R. Shadish, 2005. "Increasing the Degrees of Freedom in Existing Group Randomized Trials," Evaluation Review, , vol. 29(3), pages 241-267, June.
    2. Gautam, Jeny & Glover, Marewa & Scragg, Robert & Bullen, Chris & Gentles, Dudley & Nosa, Vili & McCool, Judith, 2014. "Parental and retail supply of tobacco to minors: Findings from a community-based social supply intervention study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 120-127.
    3. Hana Ross & Frank J. Chaloupka, 2003. "The effect of cigarette prices on youth smoking," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(3), pages 217-230, March.
    4. Wakefield, Melanie A PhD & Chaloupka, Frank J. PhD, 1999. "Effectiveness of Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs in Reducing Teenage Smoking: A Review," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt46n6b9mv, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    5. Arthur, Michael W. & Briney, John S. & Hawkins, J. David & Abbott, Robert D. & Brooke-Weiss, Blair L. & Catalano, Richard F., 2007. "Measuring risk and protection in communities using the Communities That Care Youth Survey," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 197-211, May.
    6. Jonathan L. Blitstein & David M. Murray & Peter J. Hannan & William R. Shadish, 2005. "Increasing the Degrees of Freedom in Future Group Randomized Trials," Evaluation Review, , vol. 29(3), pages 268-286, June.
    7. Mohammad Nurul Azam & Mohammad Shahjahan & Mahbuba Yeasmin & Nasar U Ahmed, 2016. "Prevalence of Smokeless Tobacco among Low Socioeconomic Populations: A Cross-Sectional Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, June.
    8. David M. Murray & Jonathan L. Blitstein & Peter J. Hannan & William R. Shadish, 2012. "Increasing the Degrees of Freedom in Future Group Randomized Trials," Evaluation Review, , vol. 36(6), pages 430-448, December.
    9. Levy, David T. & Hyland, Andrew & Higbee, Cheryl & Remer, Lillian & Compton, Christine, 2007. "The role of public policies in reducing smoking prevalence in California: Results from the California Tobacco Policy Simulation Model," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 167-185, July.
    10. Jason, Leonard A. & Pokorny, Steven B. & Adams, Monica, 2008. "A randomized trial evaluating tobacco possession-use-purchase laws in the USA," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 1700-1707, December.
    11. Kristin Feltmann & Johanna Gripenberg & Tobias H. Elgán, 2022. "Compliance Checks Decrease Cigarette Sales Rates to Pseudo-Underaged Mystery Shoppers: A Quasi-Experimental Control Group Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-13, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:35:y:2011:i:2:p:153-188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.