IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v23y1999i1p28-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sampling Procedures and Survey Methodologies for the 1996 Survey with Comparisons to Earlier National Roadside Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Diane C. Lestina

    (Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation)

  • Michael Greene

    (U.S. Consumer Product & Safety Commission)

  • Robert B. Voas

    (Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation)

  • Joann Wells

    (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety)

Abstract

This article describes the multistage sampling system employed in the 1996 national roadside survey and compares it to the sampling methods employed in the two prior surveys in 1973 and 1986. Also described are the data collection procedures at the selected sites, the breath-test devices used to collect blood alcohol concentration (BAC) data, and the methods used to impute BAC values where breath-test measures were not obtained. Overall, almost twice as many (6,298 in 1996 compared to 3,698 in 1973 and 3,043 in 1986) drivers were interviewed in the most recent national survey as in the previous efforts. The procedures implemented in the three surveys are sufficiently similar to permit comparison of these surveys conducted at 10-year intervals.

Suggested Citation

  • Diane C. Lestina & Michael Greene & Robert B. Voas & Joann Wells, 1999. "Sampling Procedures and Survey Methodologies for the 1996 Survey with Comparisons to Earlier National Roadside Surveys," Evaluation Review, , vol. 23(1), pages 28-46, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:23:y:1999:i:1:p:28-46
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9902300102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9902300102
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9902300102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel F. Heitjan & Roderick J. A. Little, 1991. "Multiple Imputation for the Fatal Accident Reporting System," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 40(1), pages 13-29, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vicki Freedman & Douglas Wolf, 1995. "A case study on the use of multiple imputation," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 32(3), pages 459-470, August.
    2. Marco Di Zio & Ugo Guarnera, 2008. "A multiple imputation method for non-Gaussian data," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(1), pages 75-90.
    3. Chaton, Corinne & Gouraud, Alexandre, 2020. "Simulation of fuel poverty in France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Rebecca R. Andridge & Roderick J. A. Little, 2010. "A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non‐response," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 78(1), pages 40-64, April.
    5. Chia-Ning Wang & Roderick Little & Bin Nan & Siobán D. Harlow, 2011. "A Hot-Deck Multiple Imputation Procedure for Gaps in Longitudinal Recurrent Event Histories," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1573-1582, December.
    6. Schenker, Nathaniel & Taylor, Jeremy M. G., 1996. "Partially parametric techniques for multiple imputation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 425-446, August.
    7. Kwon, Tae Yeon & Park, Yousung, 2015. "A new multiple imputation method for bounded missing values," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 204-209.
    8. repec:jss:jstsof:45:i02 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Wenqing Jiang & Jiangjie Zhou & Baosheng Liang, 2023. "An Improved Dunnett’s Procedure for Comparing Multiple Treatments with a Control in the Presence of Missing Observations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Encarnita Mariotti-Ferrandiz & Hang-Phuong Pham & Sophie Dulauroy & Olivier Gorgette & David Klatzmann & Pierre-André Cazenave & Sylviane Pied & Adrien Six, 2016. "A TCRβ Repertoire Signature Can Predict Experimental Cerebral Malaria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Brownstone, David, 1997. "Multiple Imputation Methodology for Missing Data, Non-Random Response, and Panel Attrition," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2zd6w6hh, University of California Transportation Center.
    12. Gabriele B. Durrant & Chris Skinner, 2006. "Using data augmentation to correct for non‐ignorable non‐response when surrogate data are available: an application to the distribution of hourly pay," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(3), pages 605-623, July.
    13. Lana Salih Joelsson & Evangelia Elenis & Kjell Wanggren & Anna Berglund & Anastasia N Iliadou & Carolyn E Cesta & Sunni L Mumford & Richard White & Tanja Tydén & Alkistis Skalkidou, 2019. "Investigating the effect of lifestyle risk factors upon number of aspirated and mature oocytes in in vitro fertilization cycles: Interaction with antral follicle count," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, August.
    14. Chiu-Hsieh Hsu & Jeremy Taylor & Susan Murray, 2004. "Multiple Imputation For Interval Censored Data With Auxiliary Variables," The University of Michigan Department of Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1025, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    15. Daniel McNeish, 2017. "Missing data methods for arbitrary missingness with small samples," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 24-39, January.
    16. Chenyang Gu & Roee Gutman, 2017. "Combining item response theory with multiple imputation to equate health assessment questionnaires," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 990-998, September.
    17. Patrick Lloyd‐Smith, 2021. "The economic benefits of recreation in Canada," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(4), pages 1684-1715, November.
    18. Taylor, Jeremy M. G. & Murray, Susan & Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, 2002. "Survival estimation and testing via multiple imputation," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 221-232, July.
    19. Patrick M. Joyce & Donald Malec & Roderick J. A. Little & Aaron Gilary & Alfredo Navarro & Mark E. Asiala, 2014. "Statistical Modeling Methodology for the Voting Rights Act Section 203 Language Assistance Determinations," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(505), pages 36-47, March.
    20. Benjamin Gochanour & Sixia Chen & Laura Beebe & David Haziza, 2023. "A semiparametric multiply robust multiple imputation method for causal inference," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 86(5), pages 517-542, July.
    21. Chris Skinner & Nigel Stuttard & Gabriele Beissel‐Durrant & James Jenkins, 2002. "The Measurement of Low Pay in the UK Labour Force Survey," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 64(supplemen), pages 653-676, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:23:y:1999:i:1:p:28-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.