IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v18y1994i2p153-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pitfalls in Evaluating the Effectiveness of Case Management Programs for Homeless Persons

Author

Listed:
  • Robert G. Orwin

    (R.O.W. Sciences, Inc.)

  • L. Joseph Sonnefeld

    (R.O.W. Sciences, Inc.)

  • Roberta Garrison-Mogren

    (R.O.W. Sciences, Inc.)

  • Nancy Gray Smith

    (R.O.W. Sciences, Inc.)

Abstract

It is generally believed that homeless individuals—particularly those with substance abuse problems or mental illness—are unable to access the full range of available benefits and com munity services on their own. In recent years, community service providers have increasingly looked toward case management as the intervention of choice for solving this problem. Yet the evaluation findings of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Community Demonstration Program, which included three case management projects, showed few clear indications of case management effectiveness. The results of these studies—which focused on homeless clients with alcohol and other drug problems—are consistent with studies of case management services for the homeless mentally ill. This article identifies several phenom ena that potentially explain the apparent lack of positive effects and suggests that the reasons for negative findings may lie as much with the evaluations as with the interventions. These phenomena include bias due to differential attrition from measurement, lack of intervention intensity, lack of distinction between groups, contextual factors, and additional design and measurement issues. Suggestions for improving future evaluations of case management effec tiveness are offered.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert G. Orwin & L. Joseph Sonnefeld & Roberta Garrison-Mogren & Nancy Gray Smith, 1994. "Pitfalls in Evaluating the Effectiveness of Case Management Programs for Homeless Persons," Evaluation Review, , vol. 18(2), pages 153-207, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:18:y:1994:i:2:p:153-207
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9401800203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9401800203
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9401800203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graham, Kathryn & Birchmore-Timney, Carol, 1989. "The problem of replicability in program evaluation : The component solution using the example of case management," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 179-187, January.
    2. Modrcin, Matthew & Rapp, Charles A. & Poertner, John, 1988. "The evaluation of case management services with the chronically mentally ill," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 307-314, January.
    3. Finney, John W. & Moos, Rudolf H., 1989. "Theory and method in treatment evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 307-316, January.
    4. Mercier, Celine & Fournier, Louise & Peladeau, Normand, 1992. "Program evaluation of services for the homeless : Challenges and strategies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 417-426.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Crook, Wendy P. & Mullis, Ronald L. & Cornille, Thomas A. & Mullis, Ann K., 2005. "Outcome measurement in homeless systems of care," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 379-390, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Phyllis Solomon & Jeffrey Draine, 1995. "One-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Trial of Case Management with Seriously Mentally Ill Clients Leaving Jail," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(3), pages 256-273, June.
    2. Sandra E. Herman, 1997. "Exploring the Link Between Service Quality and Outcomes," Evaluation Review, , vol. 21(3), pages 388-404, June.
    3. Johanna D. Birckmayer & Carol Hirschon Weiss, 2000. "Theory-Based Evaluation in Practice," Evaluation Review, , vol. 24(4), pages 407-431, August.
    4. Rudolf H. Moos, 1992. "Stress and Coping Theory and Evaluation Research," Evaluation Review, , vol. 16(5), pages 534-553, October.
    5. Hamner, Karl & Bryant, Deborah, 1997. "Do client characteristics predict case management activity?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 259-267, August.
    6. Bryant, Deborah M. & Bickman, Leonard, 1996. "Methodology for evaluating mental health case management," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 121-129, May.
    7. Mowbray, Carol T. & Bybee, Deborah & Collins, Mary E. & Levine, Phyllis, 1998. "Optimizing evaluation quality and utility under resource constraints," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 59-71, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:18:y:1994:i:2:p:153-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.