IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v16y1992i5p534-553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stress and Coping Theory and Evaluation Research

Author

Listed:
  • Rudolf H. Moos

    (Center for Health Care Evaluation, Department of Veterans Affairs, and Stanford University Medical Center)

Abstract

This article focuses on an attempt to integrate stress and coping theory into a framework of evaluation research. An expanded evaluation paradigm is illustrated: This paradigm encompasses the careful study of treatment implementation and considers patients'life context factors and how they influence treatment entry, duration, and outcome. Examples of the value of this paradigm are taken from a program of research on the long-term outcome of alcoholism and depression. Implications are drawn for comprehensive assessment and diagnosis, designing and improving intervention programs, and expanding stress and coping theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Rudolf H. Moos, 1992. "Stress and Coping Theory and Evaluation Research," Evaluation Review, , vol. 16(5), pages 534-553, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:16:y:1992:i:5:p:534-553
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9201600505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9201600505
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9201600505?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Finney, John W. & Moos, Rudolf H., 1989. "Theory and method in treatment evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 307-316, January.
    2. Moos, Rudolf H. & Fenn, Catharine B. & Billings, Andrew G., 1988. "Life stressors and social resources: An integrated assessment approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 27(9), pages 999-1002, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert G. Orwin & L. Joseph Sonnefeld & Roberta Garrison-Mogren & Nancy Gray Smith, 1994. "Pitfalls in Evaluating the Effectiveness of Case Management Programs for Homeless Persons," Evaluation Review, , vol. 18(2), pages 153-207, April.
    2. Sandra E. Herman, 1997. "Exploring the Link Between Service Quality and Outcomes," Evaluation Review, , vol. 21(3), pages 388-404, June.
    3. Johanna D. Birckmayer & Carol Hirschon Weiss, 2000. "Theory-Based Evaluation in Practice," Evaluation Review, , vol. 24(4), pages 407-431, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:16:y:1992:i:5:p:534-553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.