IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v16y1992i2p198-209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techniques for Analyzing Focus Group Data

Author

Listed:
  • Jane T. Bertrand

    (Tulane University)

  • Judith E. Brown

    (Institut Médical Chrétien du Kasai Kananga, Zaire)

  • Victoria M. Ward

    (Columbia University)

Abstract

Focus groups are widely used in the field of public health as a quick, low-cost means of obtaining information from selected groups in the target population for programmatic purposes. Much has been written about techniques for conducting focus groups, but there is limited practical information on systematic analysis of the results. The current article outlines three methods of recording information from focus groups onto paper, as well as three techniques for condensing hours of free-flowing discussion into a readable article that accurately reflects the main points of the focus group discussions. The value of using microcomputers in organizing the focus group information is also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane T. Bertrand & Judith E. Brown & Victoria M. Ward, 1992. "Techniques for Analyzing Focus Group Data," Evaluation Review, , vol. 16(2), pages 198-209, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:16:y:1992:i:2:p:198-209
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9201600206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9201600206
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9201600206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bhuwan Dhakal & Brijesh Thapa, 2019. "Residents’ perceptions of human–elephant conflict: case study in Bahundangi, Nepal," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 461-481, February.
    2. Bruce, Janine S., 2016. "Sexual and reproductive health policies for foster youth in California: A qualitative study of child welfare professionals' experiences and perceptions of policies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 184-200.
    3. Anna Birgitte Milford & Charlotte Kildal, 2019. "Meat Reduction by Force: The Case of “Meatless Monday” in the Norwegian Armed Forces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Adagha, Ovo & Levy, Richard M. & Carpendale, Sheelagh & Gates, Cormack & Lindquist, Mark, 2017. "Evaluation of a visual analytics decision support tool for wind farm placement planning in Alberta: Findings from a focus group study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 70-83.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:16:y:1992:i:2:p:198-209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.