IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eurjou/v31y2025i1p75-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Looking for a ‘just transition’: Sustainable forestry in Sweden and biodiverse beet sugar production in Denmark

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Clarke
  • Melahat Sahin-Dikmen

Abstract

This article aims to identify contradictions between visions of just transition and their realisation in practice, particularly the extent to which labour and nature are respected, with examples of forestry in Sweden and the beet sugar industry in Denmark. The case studies provide insight into the formation and local implementations of the just transition vision promoted by the ITUC and ILO, representing a call for the ecological modernisation of the economy. The cases illustrate its Northern European roots and limitations. Although a multi-scalar perspective positions union agency as embedded in interwoven spatial scales, particular power relations remain prevalent. Despite being formally represented through social dialogue structures at the national and European levels, Swedish and Danish unions appear to have limited involvement at the local level, with environmental and social justice effectively defined by corporate social responsibility policies. The apparent consensus hides a series of challenges: employment rights and protections in the transition, including for a significant number of migrant workers, meaningful union involvement on the ground, and a light-touch approach to environmental concerns so as not to disrupt production objectives. Ultimately, nature and labour remain positioned against each other, and unions are caught between environmentalists and employers.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Clarke & Melahat Sahin-Dikmen, 2025. "Looking for a ‘just transition’: Sustainable forestry in Sweden and biodiverse beet sugar production in Denmark," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 31(1), pages 75-94, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:eurjou:v:31:y:2025:i:1:p:75-94
    DOI: 10.1177/09596801241274578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09596801241274578
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09596801241274578?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eurjou:v:31:y:2025:i:1:p:75-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.