IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eurjou/v31y2025i1p115-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Servant of three masters? Comparing competing demands of representation, integration and solidarity – Dutch vis-à -vis German works councils

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Behrens
  • Wolfram Brehmer
  • Yolanda Grift
  • Saraï Sapulete
  • Annette van den Berg
  • Arjen van Witteloostuijn

Abstract

Comparing the Netherlands and Germany, and building on different theoretical perspectives on cooperation, we analyse whether works councils are able to accommodate and reconcile the competing demands of representation (relationship to the workforce), integration (relationship to management) and solidarity (relations to the union), or whether varying geometries of interest lead works councils to prefer one of those three demands. The analysis of an online-survey of 1,776 works councillors reveals differences and similarities between the two countries. Despite very similar institutional settings, multivariate statistical analysis shows that works councils differ in the priorities they set when choosing a preferred partner. German worker representatives feel close to the unions and workforce alike, while their Dutch counterparts maintain comparatively close relations to management. Nevertheless, we see many similarities as well. So, despite different historical trajectories and differences in regulatory detail, works councils have much in common in both countries, which suggests that they have a systematic impact on how employee voice materialises on the ground.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Behrens & Wolfram Brehmer & Yolanda Grift & Saraï Sapulete & Annette van den Berg & Arjen van Witteloostuijn, 2025. "Servant of three masters? Comparing competing demands of representation, integration and solidarity – Dutch vis-à -vis German works councils," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 31(1), pages 115-138, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:eurjou:v:31:y:2025:i:1:p:115-138
    DOI: 10.1177/09596801241284901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09596801241284901
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09596801241284901?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eurjou:v:31:y:2025:i:1:p:115-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.