IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eurjou/v29y2023i3p243-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The social policy preferences of EU employers’ organizations: An exploratory analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Igor Guardiancich
  • Andrea Terlizzi
  • David Natali

Abstract

Despite decades of European social dialogue, little is known about the social policy preferences of EU employers’ organizations (EEOs). Building on the literature on industrial relations and the role of business in welfare state development, this article explores the preferences of key EEOs (BusinessEurope, SGI Europe and SMEunited) in vocational education and training (VET), active and passive labour market policies, pensions and work–family reconciliation. Software-based qualitative content analysis of 75 position papers and 19 joint declarations, triangulated with four elite semi-structured interviews, is employed to assess employers’ preferences along four national and two European dimensions. Largely in line with the power resources theory, EEOs favour cost containment and social investment, by strengthening labour market flexicurity and reducing skills mismatches through VET. Conflicting logics of membership and influence guide the actions of EEOs: members are wary of legislation impinging on national social policy traditions; yet, greater European assertiveness makes lobbying efforts unavoidable.

Suggested Citation

  • Igor Guardiancich & Andrea Terlizzi & David Natali, 2023. "The social policy preferences of EU employers’ organizations: An exploratory analysis," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 29(3), pages 243-269, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:eurjou:v:29:y:2023:i:3:p:243-269
    DOI: 10.1177/09596801231153928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09596801231153928
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09596801231153928?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eurjou:v:29:y:2023:i:3:p:243-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.