IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envval/v33y2024i3p279-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Normative implications of ecophenomenology. Towards a deep anthropo-related environmental ethics

Author

Listed:
  • Kira Meyer

Abstract

Corporeality of human beings should be taken seriously and be included in their self-understanding as the ‘nature we are ourselves’. Such an ecophenomenological account has important normative implications. Firstly, I argue that the instrumental value of nature can be particularly well justified based on an ecophenomenological approach. Secondly, sentience is inseparable from corporeality. Therefore, insofar as it is a concern of the ecophenomenological approach to take corporeality and its implications seriously, sentient beings deserve direct moral consideration. Thirdly, it can strengthen the so-far underestimated category of eudaimonic values of nature, which can be best developed through an ecophenomenological reconstruction. Taken together, ecophenomenology is vital for environmental ethics and helps us to leave behind its widespread ‘centrism’. Ecophenomenology should therefore, both methodically and philosophically, be included in the discussion of environmental ethical problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Kira Meyer, 2024. "Normative implications of ecophenomenology. Towards a deep anthropo-related environmental ethics," Environmental Values, , vol. 33(3), pages 279-295, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envval:v:33:y:2024:i:3:p:279-295
    DOI: 10.1177/09632719231174086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09632719231174086
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09632719231174086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christophe Gilliand, 2021. "Experiencing Values in the Flow of Events: A Phenomenological Approach to Relational Values," Environmental Values, , vol. 30(6), pages 715-736, December.
    2. repec:sae:envval:v:29:y:2020:i:4:p:461-479 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. J. M. Howarth, 1995. "The Crisis of Ecology: A Phenomenological Perspective," Environmental Values, , vol. 4(1), pages 17-30, February.
    4. Gustavo Ruiz Chiesa & Luz Gonçalves Brito, 2022. "Learning to Walk with Turtles: Steps towards a Sacred Perception of the Environment," Environmental Values, , vol. 31(2), pages 177-192, April.
    5. Anna Deplazes-Zemp & Mollie Chapman, 2021. "The ABCs of Relational Values: Environmental Values that Include Aspects of Both Intrinsic and Instrumental Valuing," Environmental Values, , vol. 30(6), pages 669-693, December.
    6. Bryan Norton & Daniel Sanbeg, 2021. "Relational Values: A Unifying Idea in Environmental Ethics and Evaluation?," Environmental Values, , vol. 30(6), pages 695-714, December.
    7. repec:sae:envval:v:28:y:2019:i:4:p:449-470 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clive L. Spash, 2024. "Exploring economic dimensions of social ecological crises: A reply to special issue papers," Environmental Values, , vol. 33(2), pages 216-245, April.
    2. Benedikt Schmid & Iana Nesterova, 2024. "Unearthing intentionality: Building transformative capacity by reclaiming consciousness," Environmental Values, , vol. 33(3), pages 311-328, June.
    3. Oliver Harrison, 2024. "The ‘civic-transformative’ value of urban street trees," Environmental Values, , vol. 33(4), pages 363-379, August.
    4. Henrik Rydenfelt, 2024. "Promises and pitfalls of environmental pragmatism," Environmental Values, , vol. 33(4), pages 380-393, August.
    5. Rachelle K. Gould & Austin Himes & Lea May Anderson & Paola Arias Arévalo & Mollie Chapman & Dominic Lenzi & Barbara Muraca & Marc Tadaki, 2024. "Building on Spash's critiques of monetary valuation to suggest ways forward for relational values research," Environmental Values, , vol. 33(2), pages 139-162, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envval:v:33:y:2024:i:3:p:279-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.