IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envval/v30y2021i6p695-714.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relational Values: A Unifying Idea in Environmental Ethics and Evaluation?

Author

Listed:
  • Bryan Norton
  • Daniel Sanbeg

Abstract

There has been a recent spate of publications on how we should evaluate change to ecological systems, some of which have introduced the concept of ‘relational values’. Environmental ethicists have, with a few exceptions, not engaged with this debate. We survey the literature on relational values, noting that most advocates of the concept introduce relational values as an additional type of value, in addition to ‘instrumental’ and ‘intrinsic’ values. In this paper, we explore the idea that all environmental values are ultimately relational. We explore how such an approach can be articulated, and discuss the implications of this concept for the future of environmental ethics and value studies. One key implication is to suggest a stronger role for empirical ethnography.

Suggested Citation

  • Bryan Norton & Daniel Sanbeg, 2021. "Relational Values: A Unifying Idea in Environmental Ethics and Evaluation?," Environmental Values, , vol. 30(6), pages 695-714, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envval:v:30:y:2021:i:6:p:695-714
    DOI: 10.3197/096327120X16033868459458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3197/096327120X16033868459458
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3197/096327120X16033868459458?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clive L. Spash, 2024. "Exploring economic dimensions of social ecological crises: A reply to special issue papers," Environmental Values, , vol. 33(2), pages 216-245, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envval:v:30:y:2021:i:6:p:695-714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.