IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v40y2022i1p221-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contested mobilities in the maritory: Implications of boundary formation in a nomadic space

Author

Listed:
  • José Barrena

    (Environmental Policy Group, Wageningen University, The Netherlands, Department of Natural Sciences and Technology, Universidad de Aysén, Chile, Research Center Dynamics of High Latitude Marine Ecosystems, Universidad Austral de Chile, Chile, Center of Environmental Studies, Universidad Austral de Chile, Chile)

  • Alberto Harambour

    (Institute of History and Social Sciences, Universidad Austral de Chile, Chile, Research Center Dynamics of High Latitude Marine Ecosystems, Universidad Austral de Chile, Chile)

  • Machiel Lamers
  • Simon R Bush

Abstract

The mobility of nomadic Indigenous people has been systematically constrained over time by states seeking control over peripheral spaces and people. This is evident in the case of the Kawésqar nomadic ‘people of the sea’ who have been subject to a century of attempts by the Chilean state to spatially fix their movements over both their terrestrial territories and marine ‘maritories’. In this paper, we show how Indigenous groups like the Kawésqar can challenge and even regain partial control over their maritory by using spatial instruments of the state. We argue that by using these instruments to remobilise, the Kawésqar have been empowered to demobilise other groups and marine related sectors, such as aquaculture. These findings can reorient public policy to be more sensitive to Indigenous space and mobility. Instead of focusing exclusively on the establishment of spatial boundaries to exclude Indigenous communities, they can be used as a means of empowering these communities to exert control over actors and sectors seeking to limit their mobility.

Suggested Citation

  • José Barrena & Alberto Harambour & Machiel Lamers & Simon R Bush, 2022. "Contested mobilities in the maritory: Implications of boundary formation in a nomadic space," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 221-240, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:40:y:2022:i:1:p:221-240
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544211016866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544211016866
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544211016866?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avinoam Meir & Arnon Ben Israel & Batya Roded & Ibrahim Abu-Ajaj, 2019. "Taming the road, tamed by the road: sense of road as place among Indigenous Bedouin in an ethnic frontier in Israel," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 250-266, March.
    2. Henk Van Houtum & Ton Van Naerssen, 2002. "Bordering, Ordering and Othering," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 93(2), pages 125-136, May.
    3. Rasmussen, Mattias Borg & Lund, Christian, 2018. "Reconfiguring Frontier Spaces: The territorialization of resource control," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 388-399.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huib Ernste & Henk Van Houtum & Annelies Zoomers, 2009. "Trans‐World: Debating The Place And Borders Of Places In The Age Of Transnationalism," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 100(5), pages 577-586, December.
    2. Mariska JM Bottema & Simon R Bush & Peter Oosterveer, 2021. "Territories of state-led aquaculture risk management: Thailand’s Plang Yai program," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(6), pages 1231-1251, September.
    3. A. A. Gritsenko & M. V. Zotova, 2022. "Local Responses to the Contested Border in Northern Crimea," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 589-599, December.
    4. Nikita Sud, 2020. "The Unfixed State of Unfixed Land," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 51(5), pages 1175-1198, September.
    5. Paolo Cuttitta, 2016. "Mandatory Integration Measures and Differential Inclusion: The Italian Case," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 289-302, February.
    6. James W. Scott, 2021. "Bordering, Ordering and Everyday Cognitive Geographies," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 112(1), pages 26-33, February.
    7. Lisa Alvarado, 2019. "Institutional Change on a Conservationist Frontier: Local Responses to a Grabbing Process in the Name of Environmental Protection," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-17, November.
    8. SOHN Christophe & CHRISTOPOULOS Dimitris & KOSKINEN Johan, 2013. "Geography and social networks. Modelling the effects of territorial borders on policy networks," LISER Working Paper Series 2013-19, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    9. Annelies van Uden & Henk van Houtum, 2020. "Beyond Coronativism: The Need For Agape," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 111(3), pages 333-346, July.
    10. Vuola, Marketta, 2022. "The intersections of mining and neoliberal conservation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    11. Thaler, Gregory M. & Viana, Cecilia & Toni, Fabiano, 2019. "From frontier governance to governance frontier: The political geography of Brazil’s Amazon transition," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 59-72.
    12. Qianlong Bie & Cansong Li & Shangyi Zhou, 2014. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Border Policies in Dehong Prefecture of Yunnan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-16, August.
    13. Nicholas Pope, 2023. "Militias going rogue: Social dilemmas and coercive brokerage in Rio de Janeiro's urban frontier," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(3), pages 478-490, April.
    14. Cotton, Matthew & Barkemeyer, Ralf & Renzi, Barbara Gabriella & Napolitano, Giulio, 2019. "Fracking and metaphor: Analysing newspaper discourse in the USA, Australia and the United Kingdom," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Abeygunawardane, Dilini & Kronenburg García, Angela & Sun, Zhanli & Müller, Daniel & Sitoe, Almeida & Meyfroidt, Patrick, 2022. "Resource frontiers and agglomeration economies: The varied logics of transnational land-based investing in Southern and Eastern Africa," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 51(6), pages 1535-1551.
    16. Bennett, Mia M., 2018. "From state-initiated to Indigenous-driven infrastructure: The Inuvialuit and Canada’s first highway to the Arctic Ocean," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 134-148.
    17. Covadonga Bachiller López, 2023. "Border policing at sea: Tactics, routines, and the law in a Frontex patrol boat," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 63(1), pages 1-17.
    18. Chih-Hung Wang & Yu-Ting Kao & Jo-Tzu Huang, 2021. "Riverfront as a re-territorialising arena of urban governance: Territorialisation and folding of the Xindian River in Taipei metropolis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(6), pages 1245-1261, May.
    19. Raycraft, Justin, 2020. "The (un)making of marine park subjects: Environmentality and everyday resistance in a coastal Tanzanian village," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    20. Victor Kaiyuan Lin & Jenn‐Hwan Wang, 2023. "The Green Energy Transition and Peripheral City Development in China: Towards a Local Eco‐developmental State," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(3), pages 514-542, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:40:y:2022:i:1:p:221-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.