IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v25y2007i2p212-232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contested Governance and Definitions of Need in the Distribution of Funding: Investigating the Regeneration-Funding Paradox and the Role of UK National Lottery Funding in Regeneration

Author

Listed:
  • Sophie Donaldson

    (School of City and Regional Planning, Cardiff University, Glamorgan Building, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff CF10 3WA, Wales)

Abstract

The author explores the paradox of a burgeoning accepted definition of regeneration need together with a finite pot of money with which to fund it, and debates as to what consequently constitute the best funding-distribution structures and funding-allocation principles. This in turn provides the backdrop for an examination of aspects of the previously unresearched role of UK National Lottery funding in regeneration, as a potential variant in the contested-funding context. With the aid of results of an interview-based research project and a broader analysis of nationwide press reporting, it is concluded that Lottery funding plays both a qualitative and a quantitative role in regeneration. This is by enabling practical contestation of the status quo but also by supporting and complementing it, illustrating the validity of various dimensions of the debates. Such a capacity is explicable in terms of its unusual, part-independent, part-dependent (on government) governance configuration and positioning. However, Lottery funding is no panacea, for it exhibits as well as relieves certain tensions and trade-offs associated with the paradox. In terms of wider debates, the author demonstrates that governance and power are neglected in conventional discussions concerned with the formulaic assessment of funding need. It is also concluded that, in contrast to moves towards rationalisation and simplification, there is value in having a variety of funding streams (structures and distribution principles), albeit with consideration of how to make this work better.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophie Donaldson, 2007. "Contested Governance and Definitions of Need in the Distribution of Funding: Investigating the Regeneration-Funding Paradox and the Role of UK National Lottery Funding in Regeneration," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(2), pages 212-232, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:25:y:2007:i:2:p:212-232
    DOI: 10.1068/c56m
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c56m
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c56m?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruth Lupton & Rebecca Tunstall, 2003. "Is Targeting Deprived Areas an Effective Means to Reach Poor People? An assessment of one rationale for area-based funding programmes," CASE Papers 070, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    2. Arthur Midwinter, 1999. "The Politics of Needs Assessment: The Treasury Select Committee and the Barnett Formula," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 51-54, April.
    3. Ruth Lupton & Rebecca Tunstall, 2003. "Is Targeting Deprived Areas an Effective Means to Reach Poor People? An assessment of one rationale for area-based funding programmes," CASE Papers case70, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    4. Julia Darby & Anton Muscatelli & Graeme Roy, 2002. "Fiscal federalism and Fiscal Autonomy: Lessons for the UK from other Industrialised Countries," Working Papers 2002_12, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alex Fenton & Amanda Fitzgerald & Ruth Lupton, 2013. "Labour's Record on Neighbourhood Renewal in England: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 1997-2010," CASE - Social Policy in a Cold Climate Working Paper 06, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    2. Lupton, Ruth, 2005. "Changing neighbourhoods? Mapping the geography of poverty and worklessness using the 1991 and 2001 census," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27359, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Alonso, José M. & Andrews, Rhys & Jorda, Vanesa, 2019. "Do neighbourhood renewal programs reduce crime rates? Evidence from England," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 51-69.
    4. Walker, Ryan & Liddell, Christine & McKenzie, Paul & Morris, Chris, 2013. "Evaluating fuel poverty policy in Northern Ireland using a geographic approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 765-774.
    5. Gizachew Berhanu Gelet & Solomon Mulugeta Woldemichael & Ephrem Gebremariam Beyene, 2023. "The Spatial Pattern of Deprivations and Inequalities: The Case of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-32, January.
    6. Smyth, Emer & McCoy, Selina & Kingston, Gillian, 2015. "Learning from the Evaluation of DEIS," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS39.
    7. Peter Batey & Peter Brown, 2007. "The Spatial Targeting of Urban Policy Initiatives: A Geodemographic Assessment Tool," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(11), pages 2774-2793, November.
    8. Valeria Saiu, 2020. "Evaluating Outwards Regeneration Effects (OREs) in Neighborhood-Based Projects: A Reversal of Perspective and the Proposal for a New Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    9. David Clelland & Carol Hill, 2019. "Deprivation, policy and rurality: The limitations and applications of area-based deprivation indices in Scotland," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(1), pages 33-50, February.
    10. Lupton, Ruth & Fenton, Alex & Fitzgerald, Amanda, 2013. "Labour's record on neighbourhood renewal in England: policy, spending and outcomes 1997-2010," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122088, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Tony Fahey & Michelle Norris & Desmond McCafferty & Eileen Humphreys, 2011. "Combating social disadvantage in social housing estates: the policy implications of a ten year follow up study," Open Access publications 10197/5561, Research Repository, University College Dublin.
    12. repec:cep:sticas:/177 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Felix Richter, 2014. "Winner Picking in Urban Revitalization Policies: Empirical Evidence from Berlin," ERSA conference papers ersa14p1424, European Regional Science Association.
    14. Ruth Lupton & Anne Power, 2004. "What We Know about Neighbourhood Change: A literature review," CASE Reports casereport27, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    15. Lupton, Ruth & Fenton, Alex & Fitzgerald, Amanda, 2013. "Labour's record on neighbourhood renewal in England: policy, spending and outcomes 1997-2010," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 58086, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Tom Sefton, 2004. "A Fair Share of Welfare: Public Spending on Children in England," CASE Reports casereport25, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    17. Johann Bröthaler & Michael Getzner, 2011. "Fiscal Autonomy and Total Government Expenditure: An Austrian Case-study," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 17(2), pages 134-156, May.
    18. repec:kap:iaecre:v:17:y:2011:i:2:p:134-156 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Dubravka Jurlina Alibegovic, 2014. "Fiscal Autonomy ? Opportunity or Limitation for Innovative Local Development in Croatia?," ERSA conference papers ersa14p945, European Regional Science Association.
    20. Gillian Bristow & Nigel Blewitt, 2001. "The Structural Funds and Additionality in Wales: Devolution and Multilevel Governance," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(6), pages 1083-1099, June.
    21. Mohammad Arzaghi & Andrew Balthrop, 2018. "No taxation, no representation: An investigation of the relationship between natural resources and fiscal decentralization," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(7), pages 1234-1255, November.
    22. Alibegović Dubravka Jurlina & Hodžić Sabina & Bečić Emira, 2019. "The Level of Fiscal Autonomy: Evidence from Croatia, Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 91-112, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:25:y:2007:i:2:p:212-232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.