IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v19y2001i5p651-664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Property-Rights Regimes over Biological Resources

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Cullet

    (British Institute of International and Comparative Law, Charles Clore House, 17 Russell Square, London WC1B 5JP, England)

Abstract

The increasing economic importance of biological resources and, in particular, knowledge related to these resources, has made the allocation of property rights one of the most contentious issues in the debate concerning biodiversity management at the international level. The author surveys the different property-rights regimes developed to regulate access to and control over biological resources, and the relevant international instruments and institutions. He argues that the overemphasis on private property rights regimes, in particular monopoly intellectual property rights such as patents, has been inimical to the sustainable management of biological resources at local and international levels. He suggests ways to allocate property rights so as to promote forms of biodiversity management that are both socially equitable and environmentally sustainable, and analyses some of the recent developments concerning alternative forms of intellectual-property protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Cullet, 2001. "Property-Rights Regimes over Biological Resources," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 19(5), pages 651-664, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:19:y:2001:i:5:p:651-664
    DOI: 10.1068/c13s
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c13s
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c13s?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bromley, D.W. & Cernea, M.M., 1989. "The Management Of Common Property Natural Resources - Some Conceptual And Operational Fallacies," World Bank - Discussion Papers 57, World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Bottazzi & David Crespo & Harry Soria & Hy Dao & Marcelo Serrudo & Jean Paul Benavides & Stefan Schwarzer & Stephan Rist, 2014. "Carbon Sequestration in Community Forests: Trade-offs, Multiple Outcomes and Institutional Diversity in the Bolivian Amazon," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(1), pages 105-131, January.
    2. Rout, S., 2008. "Institutional and policy reforms in water sector in India: review of issues, concepts and trends," Conference Papers h042926, International Water Management Institute.
    3. Anderson, Simon & Centonze, Roberta, 2007. "Property Rights and the Management of Animal Genetic Resources," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 1529-1541, September.
    4. Roy Behnke, 1994. "Natural Resource Management in Pastoral Africa," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 12(1), pages 5-28, March.
    5. Sarker, Ashutosh & Itoh, Tadao, 2001. "Design principles in long-enduring institutions of Japanese irrigation common-pool resources," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 89-102, June.
    6. World Bank & Nicholas Institute, 2016. "Tuna Fisheries," World Bank Publications - Reports 28412, The World Bank Group.
    7. Rodrigues, Vinita & Thomas, Liya & V., Sanoop, 2018. "The Forest Game: Field Experiments as a Means to Understand and Influence Mental Models," Ecology, Economy and Society - the INSEE Journal, Indian Society of Ecological Economics (INSEE), vol. 1(02), July.
    8. Tamuli, Jitu & Choudhury, Saswati, 2009. "RE looking at forest policies in Assam: facilitating reserved forests as de facto open access," MPRA Paper 29560, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Aug 2010.
    9. Dalton, Timothy J. & A. Masters, William, 1998. "Pasture taxes and agricultural intensification in southern Mali," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 19(1-2), pages 27-32, September.
    10. Peredo, Ana Maria & Haugh, Helen M. & McLean, Murdith, 2018. "Common property: Uncommon forms of prosocial organizing," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 591-602.
    11. Ayalneh Bogale & Benedikt Korf, 2007. "To share or not to share? (non-)violence, scarcity and resource access in Somali Region, Ethiopia," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 743-765.
    12. Soderbaum, P, 1990. "Neoclassical and Institutional Approaches to Agriculture, Environment and Development," 1990 Symposium, Agricultural Restructuring in Southern Africa, July 24-27, 1990, Swakopmund, Namibia 183532, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Brent Swallow & Daniel Bromley, 1995. "Institutions, governance and incentives in common property regimes for African rangelands," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 6(2), pages 99-118, September.
    14. Gehl Sampath, Padmashree, 2003. "Defining an Intellectual Property Right on Traditional Medicinal Knowledge: A Process-Oriented Perspective," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2003-04, United Nations University - INTECH.
    15. Randhir, Timothy O. & Lee, John G., 1996. "Managing local commons in developing economies: an institutional approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, January.
    16. Gómez-Baggethun, Erik & de Groot, Rudolf & Lomas, Pedro L. & Montes, Carlos, 2010. "The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 1209-1218, April.
    17. Jean-Philippe Colin & Olivier Petit, 2022. "Accès à la terre et accès à l’eau – Un cadre d’analyse pour étudier les agricultures irriguées des pays du Sud," Post-Print hal-03986503, HAL.
    18. Rose, Laurel L., 1996. "Disputes In Common Property Regimes," LTC Papers 12763, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Land Tenure Center.
    19. Southgate, Douglas & Runge, C. Ford, 1990. "The Institutional Origins Of Deforestation In Latin America," Staff Papers 13826, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    20. Gary D. Thompson & Paul N. Wilson, 1994. "Common Property As An Institutional Response To Environmental Variability," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 12(3), pages 10-21, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:19:y:2001:i:5:p:651-664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.