IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v17y1999i1p113-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Bureaucratic Behavior on Land Apportionment in China: The Informal Process

Author

Listed:
  • K K Wong
  • X B Zhao

Abstract

In the early 1990s China experienced phenomenal, massive, speculative land development that had long range impacts on China's sustainable development. The authors attempt to examine the administrative framework of the current land-apportionment system from the perspectives both of formal or legal and of informal or quasi-legal processes. In particular, they focus on the detrimental consequences of the informal process of land apportionment, which has virtually overridden the formal process in recent years. They also cautiously scrutinize the underlying reasons for land misapportionment. They argue that the informal process is difficult to control and it will continue to impede the normal and healthy development of China's land market in the foreseeable future.

Suggested Citation

  • K K Wong & X B Zhao, 1999. "The Influence of Bureaucratic Behavior on Land Apportionment in China: The Informal Process," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 17(1), pages 113-125, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:17:y:1999:i:1:p:113-125
    DOI: 10.1068/c170113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c170113
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c170113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jihong Li & Rongxu Qiu & Kaiming Li & Wei Xu, 2018. "Informal Land Development on the Urban Fringe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Yonghua Zou & Wanxia Zhao & Robert Mason, 2014. "Marketization of Collective-owned Rural Land: A Breakthrough in Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Hai-Min Lyu & Yong-Xia Wu & Jack Shuilong Shen & An-Nan Zhou, 2018. "Assessment of Social-Economic Risk of Chinese Dual Land Use System Using Fuzzy AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Jiang Xu & Anthony Yeh & Fulong Wu, 2009. "Land Commodification: New Land Development and Politics in China since the Late 1990s," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 890-913, December.
    5. Hai-Min Lyu & Wen-Chieh Cheng & Jack Shuilong Shen & Arul Arulrajah, 2018. "Investigation of Collapsed Building Incidents on Soft Marine Deposit: Both from Social and Technical Perspectives," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:17:y:1999:i:1:p:113-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.